BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Sulfa isn't Sulphur
From:
Jim Osborn <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 26 Sep 1995 18:58:14 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines) 
Michael Stoops <[log in to unmask]> writes:
>In reference to the discovery of minute amounts of sulfer in the honey.
>Hope those people don't eat eggs...
>
>On Fri, 15 Sep 1995, Allen Dick wrote:
>> We lost the best treatment for AFB years back...
>>
>> Sulfa was an excellent control because of its persistence.
 
Michael is confusing sulfa the drug with sulphur the compound.
They're not the same.
 
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2