BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 11 May 2013 12:52:12 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
>More specifically, I am curious whether that effect also applies to the
frozen drone brood put back in a colony when the beekeeper uses drone
culling to control varroa.  Do dead drones function as "bee juice" in this
context?

Mike, that would depend upon whether those drones were infected with
something.  So let's look at the potential pathogens:

Nosema--does not appear to infect pupae to any great extent (if at all), so
likely not a problem.

AFB or EFB, unless the drone brood appeared to contain dying larvae or
pupae, likely not a problem.

Prions--no telling, but let's not go there.

Viruses--these would be the most likely pathogens, especially if the drone
pupae had been fed upon by varroa.  In that case, there would be every
reason to suspect that cannibalism or removal of such pupae would transmit
the viruses.

-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2