BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Loring Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 12 Sep 2016 13:11:27 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
> I welcome critique from others on the list and would love to here how you use liquid formic with as much detail and counts as you can provide.

Hi

I have no criticism to level toward what you described. I know many beekeepers that follow a similar regimen and I made pads myself to test when I worked at the Cornell Bee Lab. 

My question is this: why would someone go to this much trouble, when MAQs seem to be much easier and safer? Is the cost difference very great? Or do you get better efficacy? Or?

PLB

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2