BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Here we go again
From:
Bill Hesbach <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 24 Jan 2016 11:29:19 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (10 lines) 
Jerry said:
>Anyone see any problems with the articles re: supposed causation?

This is clearly a drama-driven marketing piece, but considering the "supposed causation", then I'm guessing we're back to hashing out the neurological chemistry of sub-lethal dosages - assuming that's what the Hackenberg's mean by "after-effects of neonic seed coatings". But if the Hackenberg's actually lose 90% of their bees to anything, shouldn't we be seeing the same phenomena in other places? It's a problematic claim on lots of levels.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2