BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Charles Linder <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 8 Sep 2016 10:27:02 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
My suggestion to the bee industry, since most of us replace queens at regular intervals, is to only replace queens with daughters of queens whose colonies "lived" (maintained low mite levels), as opposed to replacing them with daughters from queens whose colonies would have died (as evidenced by
high mite counts).   The point is, that so long as we are ruthlessly
selective at the queen level, there is no need to ever allow the workers on a colony to die from mites.

But those colonies  are workers and the drones which manage to be seemingly very successful before they die.

How do you account for that since many of our hives are superceded on a fairly regular basis??


Charles

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2