Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Sun, 1 Aug 1999 19:36:01 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
[log in to unmask] writes:
>No one did. And, for rigor, dodecaphony's a weak sister, just as "school"
>voice leading is. You might as well say that standard 4-part harmonic
>writing was invented to make people more creative.
School voice leading is the product of centuries of part writing practices
which were essentially developed to ensure that a 4 part piece was actually
4 parts and that the writing was a smooth as possible for the ears and for
the vocalists. It was NOT invented to make peopel more creative. This is
a common mistake I hear even among professors. Just because a professor is
an expert in 4 part writing doesn;t mean he/she is an expert in why it is
what it is.
>On the other hand, maybe there's a legitimate point. Stravinsky said that
>he didn't want absolute freedom. He had to put limits on himself before
>he could begin to compose. If you can do anything, you have too many
>decisions to make, and you can never make all of them.
I agree..I never said the contrary.
>There is no essential difference between dodecaphony and passacaglia, for
>example, or from the "solfeg" pieces of the Tudor keyboard composers or
>from the cantus firmus masses from the Renaissance. All of these things
>have the same level of constraint. It's just that the particular set of
>constraints differ.
Once again...I agree......and I have never said the contrary to this.
>... But perhaps your assumptions of what music should be caused you to
>ask it. I, for example, don't quite understand why the row of tones has to
>be beautiful in itself or beautiful simply aurally. I also don't see why
>melody (in a conventional sense - and a tone row is *not* a melody) must be
>the basis of a composition. I *like* a nice tune, but for me it's not the
>sine qua non. Most composers generally called great don't often come up
>with astonishingly beautiful melodies. It's what they do with basic
>musical material that makes them great.
I answered this fairly thoroughly in a reply to a posting by Kyle
Major....read that and you will have my reply to your very similar posting.
--Wes Crone
|
|
|