BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Canola
From:
T & M Weatherhead <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 May 1999 19:34:35 PDT
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; X-MAPIextension=".TXT"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines) 
I have been doing some more research on the canola question and came across the following for Australia.

Crude protein content varies from 18.4% to 27.1%.

This will mean that it should be good to use as feedback if trapped.

In the amino acid profile, iso-leucine was a little below De Groot's recommended formula of 4%.

The full information on canola and other species can be found by going to www.honeybee.com.au, click on "Whats new", then on "Protein Content & Amino Acid Profiles".  When you get into this, you will see all the species listed and canola is one of them.

Trevor Weatherhead
AUSTRALIA

ATOM RSS1 RSS2