CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gal Shalev <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 5 Mar 1999 00:47:46 PST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
James Zehm wrote:

>...  To those who claim they hear a difference, I always wanted
>to know; where is the difference? - Is it in a certain chord? or a certain
>note? or a certain phrase? I am pretty sure, and some should listen to
>that, that Tjajkovskijs "Pathetique" would have sounded the same if he had
>not been a homosexual, Richthers Rachmaninov would have been the same even
>if he had loved women.

Of coure there is a difference.  Emotional and temperimental.  Tell the
truth, could you imagine Rubinstein or Richter being female? For me they
bring the masculine emotional world.  Richter with his temperement and his
large massive structure and modesty.  The Prokofief concertos are very
masculine pieces.

Another very masculine pianist is Alfred Brendel.

"Gal Shalev" <[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2