LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
abbreviations
From:
Patrica Young <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 19 Feb 1999 07:26:27 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines) 
I agree about the use of some abbreviations, they obscure the post.  As
long as you are not slandering them, what is wrong with using the brand
name? (comment KA or KB?)  Besides you shouldn't be slandering anyone on
Lactnet anyway!

If you don't want clients to hear advertisements for Carnation Good Start
or any other artificial breast/baby milk just pull the plug.  Sincerely,
Pat in SNJ

ATOM RSS1 RSS2