LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Lisa Jones <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 4 Feb 1999 19:15:49 EST
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
I am trying to make the connection between LCs being sued for the
illness/death of a baby and the issue of "touching a mom with her permission".
As you can see by my signature, I am not an LC but would still love to know
what one thing has to do with the other???  It seems impossible that the
litigation is implying that an LC touched a mother and her baby and so the
baby got sick and/or died.

Touching anyone without their permission (whether it is on their arm or their
breast) is battery.  If a mom asks me to help her get her baby latched on or
show her how to use a sling, I am certainly touching her (with her permission-
after all, *she* came to *me*) - how can one not touch a mom/baby sometimes?
Especially first time mothers ... who sometimes do not understand until I
point it out what the term "tummy to tummy" means.  I also always ask the mom
before I touch just to be sure.

Lisa Jones, LLLL in sunny Wellington FL

ATOM RSS1 RSS2