LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Medical Organizations and Babywise
From:
Digest Katie Allison Granju <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 Jul 1998 16:34:23 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines) 
>
> Spokespersons for the AAP have been intervieved for an article in the WSJ
> and they have taken a welcomed stand against Babywise. I believe the WSJ
> article was printed around the first of the year.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Automatic digest processor <[log in to unmask]>
> To: Recipients of LACTNET digests <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Monday, July 06, 1998 11:04 PM
> Subject: LACTNET Digest - 6 Jul 1998
>


Although individuals within the AAP may have spoken out against Babywise
in the WSJ piece (which I have), my question is why no medical
organizations *as a group* have spoken out against it.

Katie Allison Granju
Knoxville, TN

ATOM RSS1 RSS2