HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dan Mouer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 18 Jun 1998 11:13:38 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Carl Steen wrote: .
 
snips
 
By the way, after watching techs and supervisors trowel brick rubble for many
 
> hours I rejected the use of the Harris Matrix. A good idea, but subject to
> quite suspicious implemnetation at times! Encourages the "know it all"
> attitude that plagues arcaheology I'd say!
 
 I can see that, but it is a good discipline! I have found that field directors
NEVER like it, and tend to like me less when I force them to maintain a working
matrix in the field. But it allows me to see their interpretive processes, and t
o
illustrate my own, quickly and clearly. It's just a tool, like using standardize
d
color chips, etc.
 
--
Dan Mouer
Dept. of Sociology and Anthropology
Virginia Commonwealth University
http://saturn.vcu.edu/~dmouer/homepage.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2