HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Jeff Watts-Roy <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 18 Apr 1997 11:09:16 -0400
In-Reply-To:
<H00001160b45f022@MHS>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (10 lines)
On Fri, 18 Apr 1997 Brian Siegel  wrote:
>Might the relative absence of pig bones in such trash be related to soap
>manufacturing activities?  Would pig bones--either before or after
>cooking--somehow be reserved for future soap-making activites?  In other
>words, did pig bones usually end up in pots of lye instead of in the
>ground?
 
Possibly, but one would expect other elements to be present (viz. teeth,
etc.)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2