LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kathleen Bruce <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 23 Jan 1997 21:54:55 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
I must second the notes that have implied that it is fine to go ahead with
this ballot. I agree with Jack and others who are appalled at the idea of
ILCA becoming a professional association that has no by law in place against
accepting money from formula companies. As Jack says, If not us [to protect
the WHO code[ , then who?

I am also wondering why Lactnet is NOT an appropriate venue for such a
discussion. Also, what happens for those members who are not able to
participate in a discussion like this? Will they be informed via letter of
the concerns of the membership, and have a chance to speak their minds?

Kathleen
Pax,
Kathleen B. Bruce, BSN, IBCLC co-owner Lactnet,Corgi-L,TLC, Indep. Consultant
http://together.net/~kbruce/kbbhome.html
LACTNET Archives http://library.ummed.edu/lsv/archives/lactnet.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2