HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Duncan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 1 Oct 1996 08:06:05 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Enough.
If you continue to respond to Beatly's remarks as if they were worth
comment then you add to the problem.  A simple comment about being
too aggressive and inflammatory should be the response from this
list, I would hope.
If anyone wishes to "fight" this out they can do it in the proper
setting and I believe that this list isn't it.
James Duncan
 
On Tue, 1 Oct 1996, Eliot BRAUN - 892213 wrote:
 
> Lest anyone remain confused, Eliot Braun's remarks were in response to a
> posting by someone name Parker Bea(st)tly.
> Eliot Braun
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2