HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Iain Stuart <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 5 Feb 1997 08:59:40 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Mail*Link(r) SMTP               Dammed Yankee's and Insufferable Poms
 
Of course in post-colonial Australia  we take a different view on the whole
matter of Poms vrs Yanks.
 
I might point to those interested to the work of Hodder (on bow ties) and
Tilley and Shanks (beer cans) surely this is historical archaeology of a most
respectable kind.
 
 
What about industrial archaeology, a sub-division of historical archaeology
surely the Poms are well advanced in this area even if they dismiss the
Victorian levels of their domestic sites.
 
In Australia things like 10,000 year old trading route are a modern day
political issue with the emergance of the debate over Aboriginal land rights
and native title.
 
yours
 
Iain Stuart
University of Sydney

ATOM RSS1 RSS2