Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - LACTNET Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
LACTNET Home LACTNET Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: boycott effectiveness
From:
Arly Helm <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 9 Apr 1996 08:01:41 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
I thought the *first* boycott against Nestle is what caused them to
capitulate; the second, or current boycott, is because they did not hold to
the terms of their agreement.  Moral:  the boycott against Nestle has been
effective in the past and with luck will be again.  Anyone know about this
and care to comment?

Also, if one accepts the proposition that boycotts don't work, then by the
same token we can see that positive buying (for lack of a better term)
would not work, either, since it has no more effect.

Arly Helm                                       [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV