Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 16 Nov 1994 15:05:14 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I though that I would respond both to the list as well as to Chester
Bateman, just in case someone else was interested.
We've been working with the GIS package arc/info here at the Illinois
State Museum since the early 80's. Most of the effort has been to
develop and maintain the locations of sites in the files of the Illinois
Archaeological Survey, but I have utilized it for strictly historical
archaeological purposes on a number of occasions. If you have access to
a WWW browser, point it to the url given in my signature below, and
follow the trail to "posters" and "papers".
I'll check to see if gopher will be able to find them also, but probably
not until monday. (I only do my system administration stuff on mondays
until I defend the dissertation)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Erich Schroeder Phone: (217)785-5996
Research Associate FAX: (217)785-2857
Illinois State Museum GIS Lab Internet: [log in to unmask]
http://www.museum.state.il.us/0h/ismdepts/anthro/staff/erich/erich
These are my opinions, not those of the State of Illinois.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Greetings,
>
> I am interested in hearing the failures and successes in applying GIS
> to modeling in historical sites archaeology. I am doing a paper for a
> theory course that will focus on developing good research questions for
> your GIS. It seems that GIS is only as good as your questions. Is this
> true? In the literature you see a lot of the successes but what can I
> learn from the failures in applying this powerful modeling tool?
>
> Chester Bateman
> Graduate Student etc.. [log in to unmask]
>
|
|
|