BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date:
Sun, 30 Apr 2017 18:51:08 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Peter Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
Last June Charles wrote the same thing:
> Using Queen cells put in the day of hatch this year we got right at 85% "old queen" replacement.  The cells were put in above the brood nest and did a very good job of hunting down and dispatching the old queens. Only about 5% went queenless so about 10% of the time the old queen won the battle.

He insisted then that "science and experiments" (his words) can't find this stuff out. However, science and experiments usually come with data and methodology. Not just seat of the pants estimates about how "they were dark and now they are all yellow" or vice versa. The people who have actually observed closely say it seldom works. If the cells are free, it's a waste of time. If you are buying them, it's a waste of money, too.

PLB 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2