BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date:
Tue, 5 Apr 2016 11:04:51 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Cam Bishop <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (9 lines)
>Considering the percentage of beekeepers who don't participate, how can any conclusions be accurate or valid? Probably has something to do with statistical analysis? I wonder the same thing about the USDA/ARS Surveys.

I wonder how many who fill them out really know what killed the hive. I sometimes have little idea. I look for varroa scat, see none, and attribute it to qeenlessness unless there are lots of bees still in the hive. Then I blame starvation. But I generally blame PPBK and try to figure out how to keep more alive. I know some in this area that call all their dead hives CCD or pesticide kills. Neither are correct when I look at the hives, but I'll bet they put that on the report. too easy to fudge the report. I have ceased filling it out.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2