BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 25 Apr 2016 06:15:42 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Pete, you continue to quote Mattila's papers.  May I again strongly suggest
that you reread all three (would be glad to name the three titles and point
out paragraphs of interest, off list), deeply going into the M&M and
results.

Their work was excellent, but none of their conclusions would apply to
areas in which there was not a strong fall pollen flow.  Their "pollen
restricted" colonies were awash in pollen and beebread, so of course there
was no benefit from supplying extra pollen.

-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2