BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 25 Apr 2014 12:42:48 -0600
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From:
Steve Sweet <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Research isn't free, and if Bayer didn't step up to fund the work, who else
would?

As Randy Oliver frequently says, "Show me the science!"

I say good for Bayer for funding an effort "to accurately and honestly
assess the benefits and risks of of their (neonics) interactions on
commercial honeybees and other pollinators."  At least they are willing to
fund something more productive than tilting at windmills or declaring that
the sky is falling.



"Funding for the development of this manuscript was provided by Bayer
> CropScience Ag Research Division."
>

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2