BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 1 Apr 2012 08:12:08 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
>
> >Here on BEE-L, we have regular readings from our latest scientific
> 'gospels', but it
> pays to compare what these 'gospels' say to what we see out our own window
> every so often.
>
> >It is also worth noting that the beekeepers on the ground and out in the
> fields can't
> always concur with what respected scientists of our time claim as truth.
>
> I concur with Pete, the implications of the above are nonsense.  Refuting
suppositions, opinions, and extrapolations with actual observations and
measured data is not kneejerk response--rather, it is simply being rational
and logical.

My favorite quote about science (I've lost the citation) is:  "There are
reasons that things are the way they are.  Scientists look to understand
those reasons."

The point of scientific reasoning is not to support a position, but rather
to reach an understanding of the phenomena that we observe.

-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2