BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Larry Krengel <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 14 Jan 2011 13:50:58 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Only the miticide coumaphos was at consistently
higher levels in non-CCD versus CCD colonies out of 50 pesticides
and metabolites found, supporting its beneficial role in
promoting apiary health by reducing Varroa mite stress.

---------------------------------------

Am I reading this correctly?  Coumaphos was found in higher levels in 
non-CCD colonies than in CCD colonies.  I assume this came from examining 
the wax.

One of the criticisms I have heard of coumaphos was that it is absorbed and 
would build up in wax... suggesting that this was detrimental to colony 
health.  Is it possible that the reverse is true?  I am not sure I am ready 
for foundation pretreated with coumophos.

Larry Krengel

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2