BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain
Date:
Sun, 28 Nov 2010 23:50:00 -0500
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
Sender:
From:
Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Randy writes:

> I've also posted again and again that Bayer's coumaphos was and is a huge mistake in beekeeping! 

And I wrote about this back in April of 2010:

Beekeepers using Coumaphos (Checkmite) averted losses of nearly 200 million dollars to the bee industry every year, until 2008. The total amount of loss that was avoided by the honey industry, from 1999 to 2007, attributed to the use of Coumaphos is set at 1.5 billion dollars. In 2008, the product was reclassified as PT. This indicates Permanent Threshold, which means that the difference between what was made and what might have been lost is moot, because the product's use is firmly in place.

PLB

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2