ISEN-ASTC-L is a service of the Association of Science-Technology Centers
Incorporated, a worldwide network of science museums and related institutions.
*****************************************************************************

To me, there are 3 reasons why intelligent design creationism should 
not be taught in public school science classes:

1. Intelligent design creationism is completely devoid of scientific 
content; it would be silly to include it. This fact bears repeating a 
thousand times. Adding non-science "social" issues will cause 
Amercians to become even _less_ scientifically literate.  Yes, that's 
possible.

2. Intelligent design creationism is not part of national science 
standards, any state standards, or on the SAT II biology test.  This 
is a practical reason, but standards-based lessson choice tends to 
guide curriculum content for other topics.

3. Intelligent design creationism was dreamed up as a religious tool 
and continues to be used as a religious tool, so bringing it up 
during a science class is opening the door to a discussion of 
religion and, specifically, whether a god exists.  As soon as this 
discussion begins, the focus _will_ devolve into a discussion that 
focuses too much on a judeo-christian entity, thus making non-jews 
and non-christians uncomfortable.  There are so many permutations of 
how the discussion will progress, but all of them will end, quickly, 
with the focus on one _particular_ religious viewpoint, depending on 
which religion is popular in any particular school district.  When 
one particular religious view is given a positive (or a negative) 
spin by the teacher or by the students, then the teacher has 
allowed/invited the establishment clause to be violated. Teachers 
should not be placed in this position. And science teachers (and all 
teachers!) are probably not equipped to lead a free-for-all 
discussion on the merits of various creators.


Aside from what should be taught in science classes, I hope the 
President's thoughts on the topic will speak to the need for better 
-- and more explicit -- evolution exhibits in informal science 
centers! Good exhibits that emphasize the central role of evolution 
are inherently interesting, and also help visiting teachers who are 
trying, under trying circumstances, to teach the centrality of 
evolution to their students. Science centers can be an important ally 
of the global struggle against religious extremism...right here at 
home.

And if you need a humorous perspective on the topic:

	http://www.acad.sunytccc.edu/instruct/sbrown/pic/miracle.jpg

Cheers,
Colin Purrington
-- 
Department of Biology, Swarthmore College
500 College Avenue, Swarthmore, PA  19081
tel. (610) 328-8621; fax (610) 328-8663
http://www.swarthmore.edu/NatSci/cpurrin1/index.html

***********************************************************************
More information about the Informal Science Education Network and the
Association of Science-Technology Centers may be found at http://www.astc.org.
To remove your e-mail address from the ISEN-ASTC-L list, send the
message  SIGNOFF ISEN-ASTC-L in the BODY of a message to
[log in to unmask]