BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:56:24 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
>
> >Yes, but the point of the study I cited is that they don't differentiate
> them.


Agreed, Pete.  The study you cited was talking about queen larvae.  I was
talking about worker larvae.

It would make sense for bees not to discriminate queen larvae, but sense
*to* discriminate worker larvae.  I can't remember the paper that shows that
they discriminate worker larvae, but will post if I find it.

Randy Oliver

*******************************************************
* Search the BEE-L archives at:                       *
* http://listserv.albany.edu:8080/cgi-bin/wa?S1=bee-l *
*******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2