HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Patrick Tucker <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 11 Sep 2008 22:50:24 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Not sure what you mean by "agitated," but it sounds somewhat like
black-glazed redware. This is the archaeological category for the type, not
the decorative type listed in pottery manufacturers' records. I have not
seen this category in temporal contexts later than the 1830s.

Regards,

Pat Tucker

-----Original Message-----
From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of James
Brothers
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 3:10 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Pottery Type

I have a pottery fragment from Virginia (late 1700s to end of 19C  
context). Earthenware, dark red paste. Glaze on one side is lustrous,  
other side is black and dark brown agitated. I'm pulling a blank, any  
suggestions?
Thanks
Jim Brothers

ATOM RSS1 RSS2