Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:47:08 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello,
Hadn't noticed this mentioned in the posts on
mismatched ceramic sets:
Warner, Mark S.
1998 “The Best There Is of Us”: Ceramics and Status in
African American Annapolis. In Annapolis Pasts,
edited by Paul Shackel, Paul Mullins, and Mark Warner.
University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville.
Ryan Gray
University of Chicago
--- Kate and Silas <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> May I suggest an article by George Miller published
> in Maryland Historical Magazine (Vol 69 Number 2,
> Summer 1974) entitled "A Tenant Farmer's Tableware:
> Nineteenth-Century Ceramics from Tabb's Purchase."
> In this article George explores a selection process
> of buying similar, but not identical edge-decorated
> ceramics and suggests an attempt at piecemeal set
> acquisition.
>
> Silas Hurry
> HSMC
>
> -------------- Original message --------------
> From: Doug Ross <[log in to unmask]>
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > I am looking for published archaeological studies
> that examine the use of
> > mismatched sets of ceramic vessels. I have an
> assemblage (c. 1900-1930) of
> > English teacups and saucers that clearly do not
> match one another, and I was
> > wondering how common that is on archaeological
> sites, and what meaning one
> > could read into it. I am aware of Gaw's (1975)
> article on ceramics from
> > Silcott, but was wondering what other literature
> there is out there. Thanks,
> >
> > Doug Ross
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
|
|
|