HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kris Oswald <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:41:25 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (164 lines)
I have better success with finding egg shell over chicken bone on sites
Due to  the food source being a ready to eat portable(once cooked) meal
with bone attached ..i find it real easy to see why the lack of
discarded chicken bones on sites...they didn't make it to the central
dump areas as often
As other materials.  Discarded anywhere in the yard after consuming the 
Meat the leftovers would have made an easy meal for wild or domesticated
Dog and cats...then you have your rodent's  other birds and mammal's to
feast away. Or do what we did as kids....feast on the nice chicken
breast
And toss the bones over the fence into the neighbor's yard!

Kris Oswald

Michigan Archaeological Society 
 

-----Original Message-----
From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Barbara Hickman
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 2:37 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Chickens on a Different Tangent

My memory of chicken killing at my aunt's house was that permanent
features were located in the chicken yard, namely the stump that served
as a chopping block and a large iron kettle. After the beheaded chicken
stopped running, the carcass was thrown into the pot of boiling water
that was heated by a wood fire. The boiling water was intended to loosen
the pinfeathers and make plucking easier. This doesn't address the
question, but it occurred to me that such a 'processing station might be
visible in the archeological record, distinguishable from outdoor soap
making or clothes washing because of the debris. BJH

Barbara J Hickman, Staff Archeologist
Archeological Studies Program
Environmental Affairs Division
Texas Department of Transportation
125 East 11th Street
Austin TX 78701
Telephone: 512.416.2637
Fax: 512.416.2643




>>> "Davis, Richard D Mr CTR USA IMCOM" <[log in to unmask]> 30
August, 2007 11:59 AM >>>
OK,  memory time.

"Running around like a chicken with its head cut off."   It's a fine
phrase based on what was once a common rural experience. Seems like
several of us still have personal experience of the phenomenon but as
fewer people do, the saying is likely to go the way of "dialing" a
phone, or "sounding like a broken record."

My Mom didn't like letting the executed chicken run and flap around very
much, and also didn't like holding on to its feet waiting for the death
throes to subside.  Her solution was to tie the chicken's feet up to a
clothes line, grab the head and cut the head off with a good sharp
butcher's knife.  All the flapping and spraying of blood got confined to
the immediate vicinity. I'm sure there were lots of variations on
techniques for the initial step of chicken processing.

Of course, once the chicken has been slaughtered, the fun of plucking
all the feathers off begins.

And at least in our house, the heart, liver and gizzard were the prized
delicacies that occasioned a lot of "negotiations" about who got the
last one and who should get the next one.




Richard D. Davis
CSU Research Associate for
Fort Campbell Cultural Resources 
 
 


-----Original Message-----
From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dan
Allen
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 11:20 AM
To: [log in to unmask] 
Subject: Re: poultry consumption

Fried chicken or chicken and dumplin's (and cornbread)were also a Sunday
(after church) meal where I grew up in Middle TN.  One of my most
horrific memories is of my grandmother (b. 1910s and d. 1980s) chasing
my blue-dyed easter chick, now full grown with only blue tips left on a
few feathers, around the yard, catching it, wringing its neck and
chopping its head off before my very eyes.  She kept a special hatchet
just for such purpose on the pumphouse for the well behind the house.
Unfortunately, all of the kids in my family, cousins, etc. had to go
through this whole ordeal annually in alternating colors (red, green,
blue, etc).  You could buy them from vendors on the side of the road or
at grocery and some department stores.  While she would try to be subtle
about it and do it when kids weren't watching, she was busted quite
often and always dried the tears, making up for the killing by tabling
the best chicken to ever pass a tonsil.  I've excavated a few axe and
hatche!
 t heads behind historic houses and thought of that murderous
hatchet::)  We chidren would not go near it.  Incidently, in the 1950s
from her (and my other rural and older female relatives) point of view
preparing store-butchered chicken was considered a luxury because it was
considered expensive.  It was cheaper to raise them for meal-ready-eats
and you had the benefit of fresh eggs.  We always kept some banty hens
for little bitty eggs for the kids. Also interesting, her married
surname was Hatchett:)

dan allen
cumberland research group, inc.
www.cumberlandresearch.org 

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Parkhill" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: poultry consumption


> Chicken was considered the" Sunday special meal" by many folks in the
> '30's. Those of us living on the farms in Texas always took fried
> chicken with us most of the time while working in the fields. Many
> times while working in the fields (ours and our neighbors) the wives
> and mothers would meet us in the field under a shade tree with fried
> chicken, biscuits, iced tea   et al for lunch.
> DTP
>
>
> At 08:25 AM 8/30/2007, you wrote:
> >Well, on the part of the planet I came from, we do talk to our
> >grandmothers, and they did not raise chickens, so clearly habits
> >differed - by region or cultural background, or setting.
> >Sorry, even though I come from a long-lived family, no
> >great-grandmothers available for interview.
> >If the families in my study were known to be buying eggs
> >(documentary info), do you think it likely they were ALSO raising
> >their own chickens?
> >The question of just how common chicken was in the diet c. 1900 is
> >exactly what I am trying to establish, preferably from documented,
> >quote-able sources.  When the people were promised "a chicken in
> >every pot" was that a common meal, or a specialty they dreamed of
> >tasting, maybe reserved for special occasions?
> >Meli Diamanti
> >
> >MORGAN A RIEDER wrote:
> >>Sometimes I think you all are on a different planet.  Historically,
> >>folks have always relied on eggs and fried or boiled chicken as a
> >>major part of their diet. Just ask your great-grandmother (if you
> >>were born before 1950) or consult Fanny Farmer.  And, yes, we did
> >>raise our chickens "on-site," as a number of families in our
> >>neighborhood still do.
> >>
> >>
> >>Morgan
> >>

This email message and any attachment(s) are for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary and/or confidential information which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure.

Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please contact the sender by reply email and destroy the original message and any copies of the message as well as any attachment(s) to the original message.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2