David,
In my mind, the simplest explanation is that historical archaeology concerns
the study of people whose cultures had writing.  There are extenuating
circumstances, but that applies to every discipline...fuzzy edges are
common, everywhere.
S. Walter
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Parkhill" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 8:22 AM
Subject: Hysterical Archaeology


> I am trying my best to understand all of the evaluations concerning the
> terms "Historical Archaeology", "History"and "Archaeology". The more I
> read, (it is all very good!) the more confused I become.
>
> It seems to me some folks are trying to defend their "Sacred Positions",
> which I find is usual among intellectuals, while others are trying to just
> confuse the issue. Being a neophyte in this area of study I keep asking,
> Huh? So if I may be so bold as to admit, "I don't know!" Then "What the
> heck is Historical Archaeology ?"
>
> With all due respect, I am really impressed with the quality and knowledge
> of all of you and your willingness to share and support each other.
>
> Best regards