HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Iain Stuart <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:46:12 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (50 lines)
I agree with Geoff, the processes are heavily political (having had personal
experience) and there is the huge problem of the European bias of the
committee. Several years ago there was a determined effort to bring in new
blood but it is difficult – I think a portion of my ICOMOS dues go to Paris
for whatever reason I’ve never found out. The TICCIH is another case in
point as the Nizhny Tagil Charter refers to an “industrial revolution” which
really only occurred in a few countries (and is disputed in some) as a basis
for defining industrial heritage.  Both processes have flaws.

 

yours

 

Dr Iain Stuart

Partner

JCIS Consultants

 

ABN 15 673 291 522

 

PO Box 2397

Burwood North

NSW 2134

Ph/Fax (02) 9701 0191

(0413) 380116 

HYPERLINK "mailto:[log in to unmask]"[log in to unmask]

Our website is HYPERLINK "http://www.jcis.net.au"www.jcis.net.au

 


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.2/893 - Release Date: 9/07/2007
5:22 PM
 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2