HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Classic View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Thu, 2 Nov 2006 11:48:52 +0100
text/plain (22 lines)
This opens a fairly large can of worms, not just in terms of asking
archaeologists about protecting sites & monuments, but maybe asking
anthropologists about how to interact with local cultures & maybe with
historians over possible scenarios as to what "the future" might have held
in store
But politics seems to have - or at least perceive - no place for the kind of
learning/expertise/advice we have to offer...

-----Original Message-----
From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of George
Myers
Sent: November 1, 2006 17:35
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Clifford Geertz has passed on

If a similar
"multi-national" board of archaeologists and anthropologists (i.e.,
who have studied the Kurds I also have to read) had been convened and
procedures put in place for protecting international archaeological
and people resources, perhaps the level of violence would be lower
there.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2