HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
David Rotenstein <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 14 Oct 2006 13:58:46 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Not at all, Ron. I believe what I wrote had to do with the fact that most
scholars in the fields from which archaeologists "borrow" theories, up to
and including the rare Nobel winner, ignore the archaeology. 

-----Original Message-----
From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ron May
Sent: Saturday, October 14, 2006 1:19 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: The continuing debate Industrial Archaeology

So, the gist of what you are saying, David, is that because Nobel Prize
winning scholars do not use our archaeology data that we are marginalized
and unimportant? Is this what you are saying?
 
Ron May
Legacy 106, Inc.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2