BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v728)
Sender:
Date:
Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:33:28 -0500
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
<001c01c63283$661cb5e0$1abc59d8@BusyBeeAcres>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
From:
bob darrell <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
On 15-Feb-06, at 5:57 PM, Bob Harrison wrote:

> So far not one beekeeper has been able to prove honey sold as  
> organic/raw is
> better than other honey sold in stores as far as health benefits  
> says the
> FDA.
>


Hi Bob & all

Preliminary results from a study of the antibiotic properties of  
various samples of Ontario honey shows that while honey from some  
floral sources are better than others,  samples of heated honey were  
not as good as unheated samples.  This study is financed , in part,  
by the Ontario Beekeepers Association.  While my source is well  
connected, and I know the researcher, my talk, as Bob says, is  
cheap.  Hopefully the final report will be available in the near future.

Bob Darrell
Caledon Ontario
Canada
80W44N

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2