Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 30 May 2005 19:02:58 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 5/30/2005 6:21:12 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
What still baffles me is how the drawings produced by examining cadavers can
be so drastically different from Hartmann's portrayal of the breast tissue.
Dear Friends:
Rachel raises an interesting point.
A big difference probably is based in the difference between dead and
living tissue.
There are two different schools of anatomy about bones. One is that
bones are rigid, and the bones of the skull don't move. The other is that bones
are incredibly flexible and that the skull bones do move. The difference is
that the first school of thought (which was taught to me in college in 1968)
was based on dead specimens. A basic craniosacral therapy technique involves
feeling bone movement, which, once one learns the technique, is pretty big.
My understanding is that Hartmann et al's research is based on real-time
ultrasound, completely different to dissections of dead specimens.
There are probably different genetic variations also.
warmly,
Nikki Lee RN, MS, Mother of 2, IBCLC, CCE
Maternal-Child Adjunct Faculty Union Institute and University
Film Reviews Editor, Journal of Human Lactation
Support the WHO Code and the Mother-Friendly Childbirth Initiative
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|