Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 26 Apr 2005 08:21:47 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Peter Dillon wrote:
> There is an increased talk amongst politicians, general public and
> others about increasing the levels of
> production of Bio-Diesel.
>
> What are the thoughts on this, as honey production and the associated
> export markets may be influenced?
I would guess there might be a 10-20% increase in its use if those who
want it are willing to pay a premium. Sort of like organic produce. It
costs more but you feel good when you buy it.
I have owned diesels since 1976. Biodiesel has always been a niche
product. Most of the real enthusiasts make their own from waste oil
(think fast food, the exhaust smells like french fries), so it is cheap.
Commercial Biodiesel, to be competitive, will have to be subsidized, but
nothing new here since ethanol is in that category.
If you start making it in bulk, prices may drop as long as you can keep
the price of the source down, which is unlikely.
Peter is in Canada which has a good diesel market. There is going to
have to be a strong education program in the US about automobile
diesels. They are common most everywhere else in the world, but in the
US are considered dirty polluters and are not allowed to be sold in
California and any other states that follow Cal's lead (like Maine). All
this in spite of the fact that in most categories they pollute less. So,
first there has to be a market for Biodiesel.
As far as excess honey on the market, I doubt if 10-20% more canola
honey will have much of an impact.
Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|