LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mardrey Swenson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 2 Jan 2004 16:58:22 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (53 lines)
Linda had written:

> "The baby's mouth, hands, nose, etc., can transfer bacteria and viruses to
> mother's skin, mouth, respiratory tract, etc., --  and then the mother's
> system reacts. The saliva-through-the-nipple part is the myth. Think about the
> physiology of milk flow. How would the saliva or pathogens get INTO the breast?
> By swimming upstream, up the ducts?  The milk flowing outward is a powerful
> force to cleanse the breast. The baby's saliva might get into
> mother's mouth quite easily, or onto her hands, etc. But almost certainly
> not by swimming upstream through the milk."
>
> I would have thought that as well, Linda, until last spring in New Mexico
> where I saw Peter Hartmann's ultrasounds of the milk ducts that are deep to the
> areola. The human milk fat globules are actually visible via the ultrasound.
> They had latched the baby on to one breast and put the transponder on the
> other breast. You can see that the milk is streaming forward with the MER, but
> then on the side opposite to where the baby is attached, you can see that the
> flow reverses and the fat globules start to stream upward back into the
> breast -- at a rate/speed that seems to be about the same as the outward flow.
> (So I assume it's not the fat globules just beginning to float upward.)
>
> I always balked at the concept of germs going up through the ducts, but they
> are much smaller than some components of human milk and I would guess it's
> not in the realm of impossibility. What I do think is that with all the
> protective factors in milk that the germs would most likely not fair well when
> mixed with the milk within the ducts.
>
> We've been taught that colostrum is in part composed of sodium and chloride
> derived from plasma, as well as immunoglobulins and lactoferrin and that
> during the colostral/transitional days there is a lack of tight junctions between
> the epithelial cells of the alveoli  -- the paracelluar pathway. The tight
> junctions are established and the milk becomes 'mature' milk. Were germs to
> gain access through to the ducts and if it's after the first two weeks when the
> epithelial cells lining the alveoli would then have tight junctions and no
> gaps between them, I can't see that germs could come in contact with the WBCs
> lurking in the stroma of the breast. If the mother were to have mastitis the
> tight junctions may be disturbed (and during weaning).
>
> Mardrey Swenson LLLL DC IBCLC


             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2