HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Barbara Magid <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 Oct 2003 08:10:43 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
Ron,
That's discouraging. There must not be any truly archival photo paper for
the printers. Archivists tell me that laser printer and photo copier ink is
archival, but of course they are talking about their use on archival
quality copy paper rather than photo paper.

Barbara H. Magid
Alexandria Archaeology
(703)838-4399
(703)838-6491 (fax)
www.AlexandriaArchaeology.org




                      Ron May
                      <[log in to unmask]>       To:       <[log in to unmask]>
                      Sent by:                 cc:
                      HISTORICAL               Subject:  Re: Archiving photos
                      ARCHAEOLOGY
                      <[log in to unmask]>


                      10/28/2003 03:54
                      PM
                      Please respond to
                      HISTORICAL
                      ARCHAEOLOGY






Barbara, The photos I used in the 1999 United States Army Fort Rosecrans
100th Commemoration were printed on laserjets and the images are badly
faded, even though they are stored in a room with UV sleeved lights that
only come on three days a week. The long-term survival is seriously
questionable. Fortunately, we have original prints.

Ron May
Legacy 106, Inc.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2