re., Anita Cohen-Williams'} I obviously need to remind everyone again that HISTARCH is for
historical archaeology, not aliens, predictions, and pseudoscience.
jb} Anita, there are no aliens, predictions, or pseudoscience involved in the utilization of
technology in evaluating an artifact {be it an engine of a shard}.
The purpose of the post was to demonstrate the possibilities .. if utilization of technology is
considered pseudoscience .. then it's HISTARCH that is bordering on pseudoscience.
jb