HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Jim Bowles <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 5 Jan 2003 15:16:29 -0800
MIME-version:
1.0
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
re., Anita Cohen-Williams'} I obviously need to remind everyone again that HISTARCH is for
historical archaeology, not aliens, predictions, and pseudoscience.

jb} Anita, there are no aliens, predictions, or pseudoscience involved in the utilization of
technology in evaluating an artifact {be it an engine of a shard}.

The purpose of the post was to demonstrate the possibilities .. if utilization of technology is
considered pseudoscience .. then it's HISTARCH that is bordering on pseudoscience.

jb

ATOM RSS1 RSS2