BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
[log in to unmask]
Subject:
Re: Laying workers
From:
James Kilty <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 14 Jul 2002 21:08:59 +0100
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines) 
In message <[log in to unmask]>, dan
hendricks <[log in to unmask]> writes
>Chris said:< . . . a sealed queen cell several inches above a good
>queen excluder with no other brood above the QE.  The queen was in
>full lay below the QE.>
>
>I had this happen once on undrawn foundation above a QE.  I am
>persuaded it was a case of workers moving eggs.   Roy Thurber "Bee
>Chats, Tips and Gaadgets" spoke of seeing it happen.
I had one on a dummy board in a split. Obviously this was close to
available eggs. But the cell was perfect. I made no notes on whether it
hatched in my early days of queen rearing.
--
James Kilty

ATOM RSS1 RSS2