CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mats Norrman <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Oct 2001 03:28:03 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Peter Harzem <[log in to unmask]> replies to me:

>It seems to me that the movements of a work involve essential continuity,
>both in the work itself and in the effects on the listener.  Intervals
>between them do (don/t they) provide moments for reflection, continuity,
>etc.  Applause in those intervals would be an intrusion, an unwelcome
>disruption of all that.  One of the precious practices that survive, even
>if precariously, in classical music performances (but few, if any, other
>situations) is regard for others' feelings, comfort, etc.  This, I believe,
>is something that needs to be protected as jealously as possible.

Had Mozart attended a concert of one of his concertos and nobody had
applaused the 1st and 2nd movemnts, he had disappointed went home and
written a new 1st and a new 2nd movement, had he cared to work more at
such a lousy work at all, I tell you.

Mats Norrman
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2