>a bottle-feeding as
>well as a breastfeed for a course I was ta
If ONE bottle feeding is to be seen of representative of the world
experience
I would be surprised. The baby could have been in a bad mood, under the
weather etc. I agree that I should not have had to feed babies formula but I
also confirm they were happy and generally played etc!
Tony Knox

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jo-Anne and Carlos" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 1:04 AM
Subject: apologies, threads, relationships


> 1. I am sorry for sending a post back to lactnet; it was supposed to
> bounce back to me for a while and I goofed.
> 2. I am unsure where to draw lines. Please clarify what "changing the
> subject" means in this case. The subject keeps changing, but only
> slightly. Vis:
>
> Tony Knox wrote,
>
> > I am afraid I have fed hundreds of babies with a bottle of formula and
> > have found that they do smile and play.
> >
> A setting in which hundreds of babies are being fed bottles by somebody
> other than their parents is as far from my realm of experience as a
> lactnetter feeding formula and claiming the babies are happy and
> playing. I, in fact, did have to observe and detail a bottle-feeding as
> well as a breastfeed for a course I was taking and saw a *real*
> difference. (Now, where you do see babies smiling and playing are in Dr.
> Jack's slideshow...)
> Jo-Anne
>
>              ***********************************************
> The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
> LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
> mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
> http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
>

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html