Mats Norrman ([log in to unmask]) wrote:

>I have seen this reference that Urbanek Mahler 1 is same as Nanut Mahler 1
>before, but as far as I am concerned the rumour stems from a misprint in a
>web-catlogue, which had a coverphoto of Urbaneks Mahler 1, which according
>to the surrounding text was sold as "Nanut Mahler 1".  A rather funny sort
>of misprint I think.

There has been considerable discussion of Nanut and his recordings on
the Mahler list. I don't think there's any doubt that these are the
same performance.

Deryk Barker
[log in to unmask]