BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:49:00 -0700
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization:
Hayden Bee Research Center, USDA-ARS,Tucson, Arizona
From:
John Edwards <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Dave Cushman wrote:
...................

> Too many people are arguing about this...Rather than conducting the trails
> themselves to broaden the data. You will get no help from the establishment
> or from supply houses...Try asking for 4.9mm foundation and see what
> assistance you get!
>
> I do not claim to have the answers nor these days do I have the resources or
> physical strength for large scale trials, but for my own satisfaction I will
> perform a few experiments...I have a feeling that there is much more in this
> than most people are prepared to accept. The trials are not difficult so how
> about some more activity?
> ...........................
>
> The physical control method (cellsize) needs testing in wide open spaces on
> large numbers of colonies. I would have thought that New Zealand had both
> requirements in abundance. All that is really needed is the audacity to "go
> for it".

IMHO only, I really believe the Lusbys and others (who are in possession of
rollers to produce small cell foundation) are missing the boat. They have
produced a demand - - now who will fill it ??  Why couldn't South African
foundation be imported even ??
   - John Edwards, Tucson

ATOM RSS1 RSS2