HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Dendy, John" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 30 Dec 1999 09:42:03 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
        Whoa Nellie! "Why curate all of the material recovered (does it
        contribute directly (or indirectly) to any useful data set)?  If it
was a
        mitigation effort (which is how you defined it), what material
answers the
        mitigation research design and what (material) is never going to be
part of the analysis?" writes Stephen Austin, whose address indicates he's
at a federal agency. By law, if it's a federal project, it ALL gets curated.
Do I hear from one more sector of the Army that we should de-accession
excavated material? Chuck it? An alarming trend in military thought to say
the least.

        John Dendy
        Dynamac Corporation
        Fort Riley, KS

ATOM RSS1 RSS2