Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - CLASSICAL Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
CLASSICAL Home CLASSICAL Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Copland
From:
Denis Fodor <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 31 Jan 2000 16:26:33 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Steve Schwartz:

>As long as music is concerned, no, I would not say it is only a
>matter of taste.  Otherwise, could anyone explain what ART is all about?

Philosophers have worried that bone forever.  Currently, the most sensible
theory, at least such it seems to me, is that art, including that of music,
is what is recognized as art by institutions considered authoritative by
particular societies.  No doubt a bit stuffy, and very likely prone to
manipulation by vested parties, but that may just be the best we can do.
Unless one accepts the notion that art is nothing but inspired
craftsmanship.  No doubt a bit too unstuffy, but less prone to
manipulation.

Denis Fodor                     Internet:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV