Subject: | |
From: | |
Date: | Tue, 4 Jan 2000 18:46:04 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dave Lampson ([log in to unmask]) wrote:
>... In the past I have transposed music for various instruments (ex.,
>arranging piano scores for instrumental ensembles), and I'm aware of
>the mechanics inviolved.
Without actually answering your question, I can tell you that some
composers (Schoenberg being a prime example) decided to do away with
transposing instruments, and write all the wind, brass parts at pitch.
Apparently orchestral musicians simply hated it.
I recall, belatedly, that at least part of the reason for transposing
instruments is because it makes it easier to switch between say a Bb and
an A, or D or Eb clarinet. The note which is scored as C, for instance,
sounds as Bb on the Bb clarinet (I think this is the right way roung),
as D on the D clarinet, etc, but is fingered *the same way* on each
instrument.
I gather from the Oxford Dictionary of Music that many clarinetists today
use the Bb for both Bb and A parts, transposing mentally. I trust they
wouldn't try and play Eb parts this way, as the different instruments have
different charecters and a fine orchestrator (Mahler for instance, who was
very fond of the Eb clarinet) will exploit the fact.
Deryk Barker
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|