LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for BEE-L Archives


BEE-L Archives

BEE-L Archives


February 2013


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

2013 U.S. National List of Reportable Animal Diseases (1 message)
AFB frames for teaching purposes (1 message)
almonds 2013 (3 messages)
An Ideal Cautionary Tale (2 messages)
Be(e)coming experts... (2 messages)
Be(e)coming Experts: The Controversy Over Insecticides in the Hon... (3 messages)
Be(e)coming Experts: The Controversy Over Insecticides in the Honey Bee CCD (10 messages)
Bee Culture. Why Treat for Mites? (1 message)
Bee deaths threaten valley crops (1 message)
Bee Hacker (2 messages)
Bee Informed Partnership (www.beeinformed.org) seeks additional Tech Team transfer members (2 messages)
Beekeeper Math (1 message)
Beekeeping Prescriptions (15 messages)
Bees and the Electrical Fields of Flowers (1 message)
Bees attracted to contrasting colors when looking for nectar (1 message)
Bees in eastern Scotland have lower survival rate (6 messages)
Bees in the news (again) (1 message)
Bees, lies and evidence-based policy (2 messages)
best hive setup for pollination (4 messages)
CCD revisited (2 messages)
checkerboarding (1 message)
Commemorative coin - Honey Bee (1 message)
Detrimental Practices (1 message)
Direct Correlation between Honey & Pollen Collection? (5 messages)
Disease and drawn comb (22 messages)
Does anyone know how to make Água-mel? (4 messages)
Early Spring Requeening (2 messages)
EFSA: no restrictions for neonicotinoids (8 messages)
excluders (1 message)
Fake Honey Detection (1 message)
Fw: Re: best hive setup for pollination (1 message)
Goals for the 2013 VSHBreeders Breeding Plan (1 message)
Gone away? (1 message)
Honeybee Microbiome (4 messages)
Hopped Up (4 messages)
How Does OA Drizzle kill Varroa? (12 messages)
Inspecting a Deadout (3 messages)
Intravenous Manuka Honey Inhibits Tumor Growth, Improves Cancer Survival (1 message)
Job alert: Eco-epidemiology of bee decline (INRA, France) (1 message)
large colonies perform less brood care (1 message)
Late lessons from early warnings ... (1 message)
Mites (9 messages)
Models (25 messages)
Models are Just Models (2 messages)
moving bees to almonds (3 messages)
Musings about rules of toxicology and how they pertain to bees (10 messages)
Musings continued (2 messages)
Natural selection vs breeding (1 message)
New Zealand/Australia (1 message)
Nosema and Current Be Colony Deaths (3 messages)
Nosema hits (2 messages)
Nosema issues (2 messages)
Ontario field study finds no link between seed treatments, bee deaths (8 messages)
Open Letter to the British Bee Keepers Association. (2 messages)
Queen excluders and honey supers (8 messages)
Reading the signs (5 messages)
Recent anti neonic paper from Japan (5 messages)
Reversing (1 message)
Revisionists ???? (1 message)
SABA Seminar 3 weeks away! (1 message)
Sowing dates and Neonics ban (1 message)
spelling (1 message)
Stingless Bees (12 messages)
Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides (39 messages)
sugar/syrup--mold. (16 messages)
Supersedure rates, again (2 messages)
The "Precautionary Principle" (1 message)
The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neo... (1 message)
The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union (25 messages)
Thread change: a priori assumptions (12 messages)
Thread change: neonicotinoids vs organophosphates/pyrethroids/BT/beneficial nematodes.... (4 messages)
Too Cozy? (6 messages)
urban neonic application (2 messages)
Valentin Special (2 messages)
Volunteers for bee exhibit at Ashboro, N C needed (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

BEE-L Home

BEE-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

2013 U.S. National List of Reportable Animal Diseases

2013 U.S. National List of Reportable Animal Diseases

Peter Loring Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:27:52 +0000

42 lines

New Thread

AFB frames for teaching purposes

AFB frames for teaching purposes

Aaron Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2013 11:43:43 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

almonds 2013

Re: almonds 2013

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2013 04:34:19 -0700

26 lines

Re: almonds 2013

Stan Sandler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2013 10:52:40 -0400

55 lines

Re: almonds 2013

Juanse Barros <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:13:51 -0300

26 lines

New Thread

An Ideal Cautionary Tale

An Ideal Cautionary Tale

Peter Loring Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2013 13:58:01 +0000

36 lines

Re: An Ideal Cautionary Tale

Juanse Barros <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2013 11:21:37 -0300

29 lines

New Thread

Be(e)coming experts...

Re: Be(e)coming experts...

Christina Wahl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2013 20:12:18 -0500

58 lines

Re: Be(e)coming experts...

Bob Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2013 18:37:57 -0600

36 lines

New Thread

Be(e)coming Experts: The Controversy Over Insecticides in the Hon...

Re: Be(e)coming Experts: The Controversy Over Insecticides in the Hon...

Jerry Bromenshenk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2013 12:06:26 -0500

116 lines

Re: Be(e)coming Experts: The Controversy Over Insecticides in the Hon...

Bill T <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2013 15:52:06 -0500

55 lines

Re: Be(e)coming Experts: The Controversy Over Insecticides in the Hon...

Jerry Bromenshenk <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2013 17:13:57 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

Be(e)coming Experts: The Controversy Over Insecticides in the Honey Bee CCD

Re: Be(e)coming Experts: The Controversy Over Insecticides in the Honey Bee CCD

Sai Suryan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 13:03:51 -0600

171 lines

Re: Be(e)coming Experts: The Controversy Over Insecticides in the Honey Bee CCD

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 22:56:51 -0500

65 lines

Re: Be(e)coming Experts: The Controversy Over Insecticides in the Honey Bee CCD

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:45:40 -0500

61 lines

Re: Be(e)coming Experts: The Controversy Over Insecticides in the Honey Bee CCD

Sai Suryan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2013 07:34:29 -0600

45 lines

Re: Be(e)coming Experts: The Controversy Over Insecticides in the Honey Bee CCD

Bob Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2013 07:36:26 -0600

69 lines

Re: Be(e)coming Experts: The Controversy Over Insecticides in the Honey Bee CCD

Peter Loring Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2013 14:39:47 +0000

51 lines

Re: Be(e)coming Experts: The Controversy Over Insecticides in the Honey Bee CCD

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2013 06:44:08 -0800

35 lines

Re: Be(e)coming Experts: The Controversy Over Insecticides in the Honey Bee CCD

Lewis Cauble <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:41:26 -0500

41 lines

Re: Be(e)coming Experts: The Controversy Over Insecticides in the Honey Bee CCD

Bill T <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2013 12:13:57 -0500

36 lines

Re: Be(e)coming Experts: The Controversy Over Insecticides in the Honey Bee CCD

Bill T <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2013 12:30:23 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Bee Culture. Why Treat for Mites?

Bee Culture. Why Treat for Mites?

Lewis Cauble <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:16:01 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

Bee deaths threaten valley crops

Bee deaths threaten valley crops

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:00:16 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Bee Hacker

Bee Hacker

Dennis LaMonica <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2013 10:01:14 -0500

26 lines

Re: Bee Hacker

Juanse Barros <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2013 23:28:30 -0300

43 lines

New Thread

Bee Informed Partnership (www.beeinformed.org) seeks additional Tech Team transfer members

Bee Informed Partnership (www.beeinformed.org) seeks additional Tech Team transfer members

Aaron Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2013 15:10:02 -0500

78 lines

Re: Bee Informed Partnership (www.beeinformed.org) seeks additional Tech Team transfer members

Michael Palmer <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2013 09:52:43 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Beekeeper Math

Beekeeper Math

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2013 08:34:16 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

Beekeeping Prescriptions

Beekeeping Prescriptions

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2013 15:29:00 -0500

38 lines

Re: Beekeeping Prescriptions

Kevin Gross <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2013 20:25:05 -0500

30 lines

Re: Beekeeping Prescriptions

allen dick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2013 19:50:05 -0700

20 lines

Re: Beekeeping Prescriptions

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2013 22:06:16 -0500

44 lines

Re: Beekeeping Prescriptions

Michael Palmer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 07:43:20 -0500

55 lines

Re: Beekeeping Prescriptions

Kevin Gross <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 07:49:43 -0500

41 lines

Re: Beekeeping Prescriptions

Ghislain De Roeck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 15:17:29 +0100

32 lines

Re: Beekeeping Prescriptions

Ramona <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 07:50:23 -0500

87 lines

Re: Beekeeping Prescriptions

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 17:19:04 -0500

56 lines

Re: Beekeeping Prescriptions

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 17:39:17 -0500

43 lines

Re: Beekeeping Prescriptions

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 17:44:26 -0500

45 lines

Re: Beekeeping Prescriptions

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 5 Feb 2013 05:32:01 -0500

47 lines

Re: Beekeeping Prescriptions

Juanse Barros <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:56:10 -0300

23 lines

Re: Beekeeping Prescriptions

Lionel Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2013 09:14:35 -0600

39 lines

Re: Beekeeping Prescriptions

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 7 Feb 2013 13:45:59 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

Bees and the Electrical Fields of Flowers

Bees and the Electrical Fields of Flowers

Peter Chiang Mai <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:08:14 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Bees attracted to contrasting colors when looking for nectar

Bees attracted to contrasting colors when looking for nectar

Peter Chiang Mai <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:44:44 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

Bees in eastern Scotland have lower survival rate

Bees in eastern Scotland have lower survival rate

Juanse Barros <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:00:59 -0300

23 lines

Re: Bees in eastern Scotland have lower survival rate

Bill T <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:45:32 -0500

27 lines

Re: Bees in eastern Scotland have lower survival rate

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:59:17 -0500

30 lines

Re: Bees in eastern Scotland have lower survival rate

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2013 11:01:34 -0700

27 lines

Re: Bees in eastern Scotland have lower survival rate

GAVIN RAMSAY <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2013 23:55:15 +0000

25 lines

Re: Bees in eastern Scotland have lower survival rate

Aaron Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:40:51 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

Bees in the news (again)

Bees in the news (again)

Bob Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:00:41 -0600

70 lines

New Thread

Bees, lies and evidence-based policy

Bees, lies and evidence-based policy

Juanse Barros <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:58:47 -0300

35 lines

Re: Bees, lies and evidence-based policy

Ghislain De Roeck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:20:02 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

best hive setup for pollination

best hive setup for pollination

William Sharp <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:12:19 -0800

33 lines

Re: best hive setup for pollination

Mike S <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2013 20:18:21 -0800

28 lines

Re: best hive setup for pollination

Bill T <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:38:21 -0500

28 lines

Re: best hive setup for pollination

Charles Harper <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:28:46 -0600

37 lines

New Thread

CCD revisited

CCD revisited

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:22:46 -0500

64 lines

CCD revisited

Peter Loring Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2013 16:20:29 +0000

34 lines

New Thread

checkerboarding

checkerboarding

William Lord <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 07:42:55 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

Commemorative coin - Honey Bee

Commemorative coin - Honey Bee

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 8 Feb 2013 18:43:03 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

Detrimental Practices

Re: Detrimental Practices

Mike S <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2013 15:11:15 -0800

37 lines

New Thread

Direct Correlation between Honey & Pollen Collection?

Direct Correlation between Honey & Pollen Collection?

David Tharle <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2013 08:35:35 -0700

85 lines

Re: Direct Correlation between Honey & Pollen Collection?

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2013 09:04:15 -0700

27 lines

Re: Direct Correlation between Honey & Pollen Collection?

Aaron Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:22:09 -0500

22 lines

Re: Direct Correlation between Honey & Pollen Collection?

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2013 09:28:03 -0700

28 lines

Re: Direct Correlation between Honey & Pollen Collection?

Geoff Manning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:25:40 +1100

33 lines

New Thread

Disease and drawn comb

Disease and drawn comb

Mike S <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:17:51 -0800

37 lines

Re: Disease and drawn comb

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 17 Feb 2013 18:24:23 -0500

50 lines

Re: Disease and drawn comb

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:29:29 -0700

38 lines

Re: Disease and drawn comb

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2013 06:27:33 -0800

29 lines

Re: Disease and drawn comb

Lennard Pisa <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:08:04 +0000

29 lines

Re: Disease and drawn comb

Bob Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:03:41 -0600

64 lines

Re: Disease and drawn comb

Bob Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:29:54 -0600

55 lines

Re: Disease and drawn comb

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:13:30 -0500

32 lines

Re: Disease and drawn comb

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:03:13 -0700

47 lines

Re: Disease and drawn comb

Lennard Pisa <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:08:59 +0000

49 lines

Disease and drawn comb

Christina Wahl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:38:54 -0500

34 lines

Re: Disease and drawn comb

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:56:23 -0500

26 lines

Re: Disease and drawn comb

Lennard Pisa <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:11:33 +0000

31 lines

Re: Disease and drawn comb

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:23:46 -0500

36 lines

Disease and drawn comb

Christina Wahl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:53:46 -0500

36 lines

Re: Disease and drawn comb

Lennard Pisa <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:04:18 +0000

31 lines

Re: Disease and drawn comb

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:33:21 -0500

61 lines

Re: Disease and drawn comb

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2013 07:53:03 -0500

53 lines

Re: Disease and drawn comb

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:52:08 +1300

46 lines

Re: Disease and drawn comb

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:55:42 +1300

36 lines

Re: Disease and drawn comb

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:32:43 -0700

25 lines

Re: Disease and drawn comb

Mark Burlingame <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:27:40 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

Does anyone know how to make Água-mel?

Does anyone know how to make Água-mel?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 22 Feb 2013 14:19:16 -0700

41 lines

Re: Does anyone know how to make Água-mel?

Mike Rossander <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2013 13:54:17 -0800

29 lines

Re: Does anyone know how to make Água-mel?

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 23 Feb 2013 04:52:06 -0500

23 lines

Re: Does anyone know how to make Água-mel?

Coleene <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2013 10:26:02 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Early Spring Requeening

Early Spring Requeening

Scott Ball <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:20:30 -0800

35 lines

Re: Early Spring Requeening

Charles Harper <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2013 15:40:49 -0600

41 lines

New Thread

EFSA: no restrictions for neonicotinoids

EFSA: no restrictions for neonicotinoids

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2013 14:07:50 -0500

44 lines

Re: EFSA: no restrictions for neonicotinoids

Ted Hancock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2013 22:36:09 -0500

75 lines

Re: EFSA: no restrictions for neonicotinoids

Steve Pointer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2013 15:18:57 +0000

30 lines

Re: EFSA: no restrictions for neonicotinoids

Cam Bishop <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2013 12:48:15 -0500

34 lines

Re: EFSA: no restrictions for neonicotinoids

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Mar 2013 07:02:53 +1300

87 lines

Re: EFSA: no restrictions for neonicotinoids

Christina Wahl <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2013 17:36:07 -0500

45 lines

Re: EFSA: no restrictions for neonicotinoids

Eugene Makovec <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2013 20:18:21 -0600

45 lines

Re: EFSA: no restrictions for neonicotinoids

Ted Hancock <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2013 22:44:34 -0500

65 lines

New Thread

excluders

excluders

William Lord <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2013 08:47:48 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

Fake Honey Detection

Fake Honey Detection

Peter Chiang Mai <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2013 03:08:34 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Fw: Re: best hive setup for pollination

Fw: Re: best hive setup for pollination

William Sharp <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:40:11 -0800

22 lines

New Thread

Goals for the 2013 VSHBreeders Breeding Plan

Goals for the 2013 VSHBreeders Breeding Plan

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2013 07:15:43 -0700

80 lines

New Thread

Gone away?

Gone away?

Peter Detchon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:22:14 +0800

31 lines

New Thread

Honeybee Microbiome

Honeybee Microbiome

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2013 10:21:41 -0500

41 lines

Re: Honeybee Microbiome

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2013 18:29:26 -0700

39 lines

Re: Honeybee Microbiome

Ghislain De Roeck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:20:14 +0100

60 lines

Re: Honeybee Microbiome

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2013 08:19:40 -0700

29 lines

New Thread

Hopped Up

Hopped Up

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2013 14:31:14 -0500

47 lines

Re: Hopped Up

Medhat Nasr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2013 21:03:36 +0000

38 lines

Re: Hopped Up

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:35:37 -0500

31 lines

Re: Hopped Up

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:02:45 -0700

36 lines

New Thread

How Does OA Drizzle kill Varroa?

How Does OA Drizzle kill Varroa?

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2013 22:09:13 -0500

26 lines

Re: How Does OA Drizzle kill Varroa?

Kevin Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 17:58:16 +1300

35 lines

Re: How Does OA Drizzle kill Varroa?

Ian Steppler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 00:33:00 -0500

29 lines

Re: How Does OA Drizzle kill Varroa?

Kevin Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 21:27:43 +1300

36 lines

Re: How Does OA Drizzle kill Varroa?

Peter Prodger <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 07:52:41 -0500

28 lines

Re: How Does OA Drizzle kill Varroa?

Peter Prodger <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 08:15:40 -0500

24 lines

Re: How Does OA Drizzle kill Varroa?

Medhat Nasr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:28:28 +0000

37 lines

Re: How Does OA Drizzle kill Varroa?

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 07:47:36 -0800

35 lines

Re: How Does OA Drizzle kill Varroa?

Mark Burlingame <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:03:25 -0500

29 lines

Re: How Does OA Drizzle kill Varroa?

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2013 08:14:12 -0800

30 lines

Re: How Does OA Drizzle kill Varroa?

Mark Burlingame <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2013 17:24:20 -0500

50 lines

Re: How Does OA Drizzle kill Varroa?

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2013 10:59:10 -0800

33 lines

New Thread

Inspecting a Deadout

Inspecting a Deadout

Jason Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2013 09:33:22 -0500

57 lines

Inspecting a Deadout

Jason Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2013 01:32:23 -0500

45 lines

Re: Inspecting a Deadout

Bob Darrell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2013 09:18:34 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

Intravenous Manuka Honey Inhibits Tumor Growth, Improves Cancer Survival

Intravenous Manuka Honey Inhibits Tumor Growth, Improves Cancer Survival

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 07:29:48 -0700

31 lines

New Thread

Job alert: Eco-epidemiology of bee decline (INRA, France)

Job alert: Eco-epidemiology of bee decline (INRA, France)

Juanse Barros <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2013 12:04:55 -0300

19 lines

New Thread

large colonies perform less brood care

large colonies perform less brood care

Peter Loring Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2013 12:24:58 +0000

45 lines

New Thread

Late lessons from early warnings ...

Late lessons from early warnings ...

Ghislain De Roeck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2013 09:08:03 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

Mites

Mites

Christina Wahl <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2013 10:47:13 -0500

44 lines

Re: Mites

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2013 13:26:05 -0500

42 lines

Mites

Christina Wahl <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2013 16:49:06 -0500

42 lines

Re: Mites

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 24 Feb 2013 17:31:24 -0500

91 lines

Re: Mites

Ruary Rudd <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2013 07:30:30 -0000

36 lines

Re: Mites

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:17:20 -0500

51 lines

Re: Mites

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2013 08:31:28 -0700

27 lines

Re: Mites

Lennard Pisa <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2013 16:27:56 +0000

33 lines

Re: Mites

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2013 12:13:38 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

Models

Models

Christina Wahl <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:16:35 -0500

26 lines

Re: Models

Lennard Pisa <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 09:50:19 +0000

37 lines

Models

Christina Wahl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:30:44 -0500

55 lines

Re: Models

Lennard Pisa <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 17:27:33 +0000

33 lines

Re: Models

Ted Hancock <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:25:18 -0500

50 lines

Re: Models

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 17:23:19 -0800

30 lines

Re: Models

Aaron Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 20:26:59 -0500

25 lines

Models

Christina Wahl <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 22:47:08 -0500

95 lines

Re: Models

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2013 07:56:46 -0500

52 lines

Re: Models

Mike S <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2013 06:39:27 -0800

30 lines

Re: Models

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2013 06:16:00 -0800

29 lines

Re: Models

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2013 07:10:30 -0800

30 lines

Re: Models

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:00:58 -0800

31 lines

Re: Models

Bob Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2013 22:40:28 -0600

84 lines

Re: Models

Stellio Matson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2013 21:44:42 -0800

55 lines

Re: Models

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:02:35 -0500

101 lines

Re: Models

Lionel Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2013 09:48:03 -0600

41 lines

Re: Models

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2013 08:14:54 -0800

40 lines

Re: Models

Bob Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2013 12:16:20 -0600

47 lines

Re: Models

Ted Hancock <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:56:40 -0500

37 lines

Re: Models

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:07:58 -0800

40 lines

Re: Models

Larry Garrett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:56:16 -0500

31 lines

Re: Models

Geoff Manning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:36:14 +1100

30 lines

Re: Models

Mike S <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2013 05:15:44 -0800

28 lines

Re: Models

Geoff Manning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:17:09 +1100

30 lines

New Thread

Models are Just Models

Models are Just Models

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 07:12:11 -0800

39 lines

Re: Models are Just Models

Lennard Pisa <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 16:52:03 +0000

23 lines

New Thread

moving bees to almonds

moving bees to almonds

William Lord <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:02:36 -0500

31 lines

Re: moving bees to almonds

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:05:58 -0800

53 lines

Moving bees to almonds

DICK MARRON <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:46:10 -0400

68 lines

New Thread

Musings about rules of toxicology and how they pertain to bees

Musings about rules of toxicology and how they pertain to bees

Christina Wahl <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2013 11:26:36 -0500

68 lines

Re: Musings about rules of toxicology and how they pertain to bees

Mike S <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2013 09:36:28 -0800

30 lines

Re: Musings about rules of toxicology and how they pertain to bees

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2013 09:34:17 -0800

49 lines

Re: Musings about rules of toxicology and how they pertain to bees

Bob Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2013 13:42:43 -0600

44 lines

Musings about rules of toxicology and how they pertain to bees

Christina Wahl <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2013 14:55:54 -0500

40 lines

Re: Musings about rules of toxicology and how they pertain to bees

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:14:37 -0500

52 lines

Re: Musings about rules of toxicology and how they pertain to bees

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2013 14:18:00 -0800

30 lines

Re: Musings about rules of toxicology and how they pertain to bees

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2013 14:20:44 -0800

38 lines

Re: Musings about rules of toxicology and how they pertain to bees

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 3 Feb 2013 17:45:50 -0500

34 lines

Re: Musings about rules of toxicology and how they pertain to bees

Geoff Manning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 16:36:37 +1100

29 lines

New Thread

Musings continued

Musings continued

Christina Wahl <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 19:50:41 -0500

67 lines

Re: Musings continued

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2013 07:11:58 -0800

87 lines

New Thread

Natural selection vs breeding

Natural selection vs breeding

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 07:57:16 -0500

61 lines

New Thread

New Zealand/Australia

New Zealand/Australia

Jerry Bromenshenk <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2013 19:11:37 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

Nosema and Current Be Colony Deaths

Nosema and Current Be Colony Deaths

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 06:55:06 -0800

26 lines

Re: Nosema and Current Be Colony Deaths

Jerry Bromenshenk <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:38:51 -0500

77 lines

Re: Nosema and Current Be Colony Deaths

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:46:26 -0800

32 lines

New Thread

Nosema hits

Nosema hits

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2013 08:56:52 -0800

32 lines

Re: Nosema hits

Mike S <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:09:20 -0800

27 lines

New Thread

Nosema issues

Nosema issues

William Lord <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:59:58 -0500

74 lines

Re: Nosema issues

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 07:20:03 -0800

52 lines

New Thread

Ontario field study finds no link between seed treatments, bee deaths

Ontario field study finds no link between seed treatments, bee deaths

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:47:09 -0700

34 lines

Re: Ontario field study finds no link between seed treatments, bee deaths

Stan Sandler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2013 22:09:12 -0400

47 lines

Re: Ontario field study finds no link between seed treatments, bee deaths

Dave Fischer <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2013 01:15:51 -0500

66 lines

Re: Ontario field study finds no link between seed treatments, bee deaths

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2013 09:18:04 -0700

48 lines

Re: Ontario field study finds no link between seed treatments, bee deaths

Ted Hancock <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:57:17 -0500

58 lines

Re: Ontario field study finds no link between seed treatments, bee deaths

Bill T <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2013 19:29:19 -0500

52 lines

Re: Ontario field study finds no link between seed treatments, bee deaths

Kristine Naess <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:02:29 -0500

24 lines

Re: Ontario field study finds no link between seed treatments, bee deaths

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:15:05 -0800

41 lines

New Thread

Open Letter to the British Bee Keepers Association.

Open Letter to the British Bee Keepers Association.

Ghislain De Roeck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2013 09:10:26 +0100

28 lines

Re: Open Letter to the British Bee Keepers Association.

Jonathan Getty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2013 06:03:32 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

Queen excluders and honey supers

Re: Queen excluders and honey supers

Geoff Manning <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2013 15:54:08 +1100

28 lines

Re: Queen excluders and honey supers

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2013 07:24:14 -0500

40 lines

Re: Queen excluders and honey supers

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2013 18:19:26 -0800

33 lines

Re: Queen excluders and honey supers

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2013 12:12:56 -0500

66 lines

Re: Queen excluders and honey supers

Dave <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2013 11:57:07 -0700

30 lines

Re: Queen excluders and honey supers

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2013 05:06:20 -0800

41 lines

Re: Queen excluders and honey supers

Dave <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 07:12:35 -0700

25 lines

Re: Queen excluders and honey supers

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2013 11:07:26 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

Reading the signs

Re: Reading the signs

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2013 05:26:51 -0800

47 lines

reading the signs

Tony Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2013 11:04:37 -0400

38 lines

Re: reading the signs

Kevin Gross <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2013 11:42:53 -0500

29 lines

Re: reading the signs

GAVIN RAMSAY <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2013 17:05:15 +0000

24 lines

Re: reading the signs

Bob Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2013 11:51:58 -0600

37 lines

New Thread

Recent anti neonic paper from Japan

Recent anti neonic paper from Japan

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2013 05:49:56 -0800

55 lines

Re: Recent anti neonic paper from Japan

Bob Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:18:31 -0600

40 lines

Re: Recent anti neonic paper from Japan

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2013 18:20:56 -0800

47 lines

Re: Recent anti neonic paper from Japan

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2013 10:14:05 -0500

49 lines

Re: Recent anti neonic paper from Japan

Bob Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2013 12:32:14 -0600

37 lines

New Thread

Reversing

Re: Reversing

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2013 05:42:40 -0800

31 lines

New Thread

Revisionists ????

Re: Revisionists ????

Mike S <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2013 08:59:33 -0800

37 lines

New Thread

SABA Seminar 3 weeks away!

SABA Seminar 3 weeks away!

Aaron Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2013 22:09:10 -0500

74 lines

New Thread

Sowing dates and Neonics ban

Sowing dates and Neonics ban

Juanse Barros <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2013 01:52:44 -0300

46 lines

New Thread

spelling

spelling

Lewis Cauble <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 14:23:15 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Stingless Bees

Stingless Bees

Peter Chiang Mai <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2013 19:32:17 -0500

34 lines

Re: Stingless Bees

Stan Sandler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:06:43 -0400

59 lines

Re: Stingless Bees

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2013 20:56:26 -0500

26 lines

Re: Stingless Bees

Peter Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2013 12:43:52 -0000

26 lines

Re: Stingless Bees

peter <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2013 07:47:36 +0700

28 lines

Re: Stingless Bees

Mike S <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:29:16 -0800

29 lines

Re: Stingless Bees

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2013 21:15:24 -0500

34 lines

Re: Stingless Bees

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2013 21:32:05 -0500

54 lines

Re: Stingless Bees

Peter Keating <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2013 22:07:50 -0500

51 lines

Re: Stingless Bees

Lennard Pisa <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:51:37 +0000

36 lines

Re: Stingless Bees

Peter Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2013 15:24:48 -0000

32 lines

Re: Stingless Bees

peter <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:49:14 +0700

30 lines

New Thread

Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:19:35 -0500

41 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2013 11:27:13 -0800

32 lines

Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

Christina Wahl <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2013 16:12:01 -0500

69 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

Jerry Bromenshenk <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2013 16:56:55 -0500

31 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

Stan Sandler <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2013 21:51:20 -0400

45 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

Bob Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2013 21:00:25 -0600

70 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

Jerry Bromenshenk <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2013 00:16:58 -0500

70 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

Jerry Bromenshenk <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2013 01:51:25 -0500

210 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

Ghislain De Roeck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:04:02 +0100

57 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

Bob Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2013 04:26:12 -0600

29 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2013 08:03:40 -0500

47 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

Stan Sandler <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:23:31 -0400

52 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

Stan Sandler <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:39:18 -0400

27 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:50:32 -0500

29 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2013 11:54:06 -0500

45 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

Jerry Bromenshenk <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:28:18 -0500

33 lines

Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

Christina Wahl <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2013 13:49:46 -0500

109 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2013 10:14:51 -0800

33 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2013 12:48:43 -0800

34 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2013 17:17:53 -0500

88 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 00:08:19 +0000

25 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

Ghislain De Roeck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:57:33 +0100

33 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 05:15:37 -0500

38 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 05:28:24 -0500

28 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 07:35:08 -0800

52 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

Ghislain De Roeck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:21:43 +0100

39 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:41:03 -0800

43 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

Stan Sandler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 20:56:17 -0400

40 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:04:56 -0800

53 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

Stan Sandler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:28:13 -0400

91 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

Ghislain De Roeck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 08:05:34 +0100

30 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 06:22:29 -0800

56 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 06:24:03 -0800

33 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

Mike S <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 06:57:10 -0800

34 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

Bob Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 17:58:48 -0600

105 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 13:30:32 -0500

32 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

Stan Sandler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2013 10:26:21 -0400

100 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2013 06:09:25 -0800

90 lines

Re: Sub-Lethal Effects of Pesticides

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2013 07:34:58 -0800

43 lines

New Thread

sugar/syrup--mold.

sugar/syrup--mold.

jimmy odom <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:27:18 -0500

39 lines

Re: sugar/syrup--mold.

Mike Rossander <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 09:00:40 -0800

28 lines

Re: sugar/syrup--mold.

Aaron Morris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 12:20:47 -0500

20 lines

Re: sugar/syrup--mold.

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 14:35:11 -0800

30 lines

Re: sugar/syrup--mold.

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 18:02:56 -0800

28 lines

Re: sugar/syrup--mold.

Peter Edwards <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 10:13:56 -0000

29 lines

Re: sugar/syrup--mold.

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 05:31:29 -0800

32 lines

Re: sugar/syrup--mold.

Little Wolf Apiaries -our bees get all the attraction <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 09:29:53 -0500

36 lines

Re: sugar/syrup--mold.

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 07:42:38 -0800

35 lines

Re: sugar/syrup--mold.

25 Hives <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 08:57:43 -0800

38 lines

Re: sugar/syrup--mold.

Cam Bishop <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:04:56 -0500

23 lines

Re: sugar/syrup--mold.

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 18:48:05 -0800

40 lines

Re: sugar/syrup--mold.

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 18:57:38 -0800

29 lines

Re: sugar/syrup--mold.

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2013 07:18:27 -0800

32 lines

Re: sugar/syrup--mold.

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:00:05 -0800

29 lines

Re: sugar/syrup--mold.

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:17:28 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

Supersedure rates, again

Supersedure rates, again

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2013 12:27:58 -0500

70 lines

Re: Supersedure rates, again

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2013 15:20:23 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

The "Precautionary Principle"

The "Precautionary Principle"

Mike Rossander <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 09:42:45 -0800

84 lines

New Thread

The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neo...

Re: The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neo...

Jerry Bromenshenk <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2013 14:19:43 -0500

63 lines

New Thread

The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union

Re: The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union

Ghislain De Roeck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2013 09:52:09 +0100

96 lines

Re: The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union

Ghislain De Roeck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2013 11:29:17 +0100

37 lines

Re: The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union

GAVIN RAMSAY <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2013 08:26:47 +0000

42 lines

Re: The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union

Bill T <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2013 09:17:29 -0500

39 lines

Re: The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union

Bob Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2013 09:02:37 -0600

56 lines

Re: The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union

Bob Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2013 11:17:10 -0600

77 lines

Re: The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union

Ghislain De Roeck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2013 20:49:11 +0100

58 lines

Re: The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2013 16:46:05 -0500

43 lines

Re: The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union

Peter Detchon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2013 07:52:21 +0800

30 lines

Re: The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2013 17:51:22 -0800

63 lines

Re: The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2013 18:00:48 -0800

51 lines

Re: The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2013 18:08:53 -0800

57 lines

Re: The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union

Bill T <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2013 10:21:14 -0500

54 lines

Re: The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union

Geoff Manning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 13:55:57 +1100

33 lines

Re: The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union

Geoff Manning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:07:40 +1100

30 lines

Re: The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 08:27:01 -0500

41 lines

Re: The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 08:43:01 -0500

60 lines

Re: The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union

Ghislain De Roeck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 18:33:06 +0100

45 lines

Re: The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 13:22:12 -0800

52 lines

Re: The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union

Juanse Barros <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2013 22:18:22 -0300

27 lines

Re: The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union

Ghislain De Roeck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2013 08:17:04 +0100

33 lines

Re: The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union

Ghislain De Roeck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2013 09:56:32 +0100

46 lines

Re: The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union

Juanse Barros <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2013 10:48:05 -0300

40 lines

Re: The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union

Mike S <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2013 06:31:23 -0800

35 lines

Re: The socio-economic, technological, and environmental value of Neonicotinoid seed treatment in the European Union

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2013 06:58:48 -0800

60 lines

New Thread

Thread change: a priori assumptions

Re: Thread change: a priori assumptions

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2013 12:54:20 -0500

44 lines

Re: Thread change: a priori assumptions

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2013 20:16:41 -0500

26 lines

Re: Thread change: a priori assumptions

Bob Harrison <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2013 18:57:31 -0600

47 lines

Re: Thread change: a priori assumptions

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2013 20:56:14 -0500

50 lines

Re: Thread change: a priori assumptions

Ghislain De Roeck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2013 12:54:40 +0100

52 lines

Re: Thread change: a priori assumptions

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2013 10:26:01 -0500

26 lines

Re: Thread change: a priori assumptions

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2013 11:22:41 -0800

36 lines

Re: Thread change: a priori assumptions

Stan Sandler <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2013 20:46:13 -0400

56 lines

Re: Thread change: a priori assumptions

Peter Detchon <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2013 10:36:56 +0800

66 lines

Re: Thread change: a priori assumptions

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2013 09:13:14 -0800

43 lines

Re: Thread change: a priori assumptions

Stan Sandler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 02:30:45 -0400

37 lines

Re: Thread change: a priori assumptions

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2013 06:21:01 -0800

47 lines

New Thread

Thread change: neonicotinoids vs organophosphates/pyrethroids/BT/beneficial nematodes....

Thread change: neonicotinoids vs organophosphates/pyrethroids/BT/beneficial nematodes....

Stan Sandler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2013 21:30:48 -0400

127 lines

Re: Thread change: neonicotinoids vs organophosphates/pyrethroids/BT/beneficial nematodes....

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2013 07:50:29 -0500

77 lines

Re: Thread change: neonicotinoids vs organophosphates/pyrethroids/BT/beneficial nematodes....

Stan Sandler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2013 10:16:48 -0400

41 lines

Re: Thread change: neonicotinoids vs organophosphates/pyrethroids/BT/beneficial nematodes....

Ramona <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2013 11:56:23 -0500

112 lines

New Thread

Too Cozy?

Too Cozy?

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 17:01:48 -0800

50 lines

Too Cozy?

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 17:29:11 -0800

50 lines

Re: Too Cozy?

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2013 19:01:46 -0800

31 lines

Re: Too Cozy?

Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2013 08:44:11 -0500

25 lines

Re: Too Cozy?

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 16 Feb 2013 18:55:08 -0500

28 lines

Re: Too Cozy?

allen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2013 18:15:41 -0700

24 lines

New Thread

urban neonic application

urban neonic application

Jeremy Rose <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:26:10 -0800

36 lines

Re: urban neonic application

randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:23:08 -0800

32 lines

New Thread

Valentin Special

Valentin Special

Juanse Barros <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2013 12:51:19 -0300

21 lines

Re: Valentin Special

Ramona <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:43:23 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

Volunteers for bee exhibit at Ashboro, N C needed

Re: Volunteers for bee exhibit at Ashboro, N C needed

Mike S <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2013 19:02:15 -0800

60 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010, Week 1
June 2010
May 2010, Week 5
May 2010, Week 4
May 2010, Week 3
May 2010, Week 2
May 2010, Week 1
April 2010, Week 5
April 2010, Week 4
April 2010, Week 3
April 2010, Week 2
April 2010, Week 1
March 2010, Week 5
March 2010, Week 4
March 2010, Week 3
March 2010, Week 2
March 2010, Week 1
February 2010, Week 4
February 2010, Week 3
February 2010, Week 2
February 2010, Week 1
January 2010, Week 5
January 2010, Week 4
January 2010, Week 3
January 2010, Week 2
January 2010, Week 1
December 2009, Week 5
December 2009, Week 4
December 2009, Week 3
December 2009, Week 2
December 2009, Week 1
November 2009, Week 5
November 2009, Week 4
November 2009, Week 3
November 2009, Week 2
November 2009, Week 1
October 2009, Week 5
October 2009, Week 4
October 2009, Week 3
October 2009, Week 2
October 2009, Week 1
September 2009, Week 5
September 2009, Week 4
September 2009, Week 3
September 2009, Week 2
September 2009, Week 1
August 2009, Week 5
August 2009, Week 4
August 2009, Week 3
August 2009, Week 2
August 2009, Week 1
July 2009, Week 5
July 2009, Week 4
July 2009, Week 3
July 2009, Week 2
July 2009, Week 1
June 2009, Week 5
June 2009, Week 4
June 2009, Week 3
June 2009, Week 2
June 2009, Week 1
May 2009, Week 5
May 2009, Week 4
May 2009, Week 3
May 2009, Week 2
May 2009, Week 1
April 2009, Week 5
April 2009, Week 4
April 2009, Week 3
April 2009, Week 2
April 2009, Week 1
March 2009, Week 5
March 2009, Week 4
March 2009, Week 3
March 2009, Week 2
March 2009, Week 1
February 2009, Week 4
February 2009, Week 3
February 2009, Week 2
February 2009, Week 1
January 2009, Week 5
January 2009, Week 4
January 2009, Week 3
January 2009, Week 2
January 2009, Week 1
December 2008, Week 5
December 2008, Week 4
December 2008, Week 3
December 2008, Week 2
December 2008, Week 1
November 2008, Week 5
November 2008, Week 4
November 2008, Week 3
November 2008, Week 2
November 2008, Week 1
October 2008, Week 5
October 2008, Week 4
October 2008, Week 3
October 2008, Week 2
October 2008, Week 1
September 2008, Week 5
September 2008, Week 4
September 2008, Week 3
September 2008, Week 2
September 2008, Week 1
August 2008, Week 5
August 2008, Week 4
August 2008, Week 3
August 2008, Week 2
August 2008, Week 1
July 2008, Week 5
July 2008, Week 4
July 2008, Week 3
July 2008, Week 2
July 2008, Week 1
June 2008, Week 5
June 2008, Week 4
June 2008, Week 3
June 2008, Week 2
June 2008, Week 1
May 2008, Week 5
May 2008, Week 4
May 2008, Week 3
May 2008, Week 2
May 2008, Week 1
April 2008, Week 5
April 2008, Week 4
April 2008, Week 3
April 2008, Week 2
April 2008, Week 1
March 2008, Week 5
March 2008, Week 4
March 2008, Week 3
March 2008, Week 2
March 2008, Week 1
February 2008, Week 5
February 2008, Week 4
February 2008, Week 3
February 2008, Week 2
February 2008, Week 1
January 2008, Week 5
January 2008, Week 4
January 2008, Week 3
January 2008, Week 2
January 2008, Week 1
December 2007, Week 5
December 2007, Week 4
December 2007, Week 3
December 2007, Week 2
December 2007, Week 1
November 2007, Week 5
November 2007, Week 4
November 2007, Week 3
November 2007, Week 2
November 2007, Week 1
October 2007, Week 5
October 2007, Week 4
October 2007, Week 3
October 2007, Week 2
October 2007, Week 1
September 2007, Week 5
September 2007, Week 4
September 2007, Week 3
September 2007, Week 2
September 2007, Week 1
August 2007, Week 5
August 2007, Week 4
August 2007, Week 3
August 2007, Week 2
August 2007, Week 1
July 2007, Week 5
July 2007, Week 4
July 2007, Week 3
July 2007, Week 2
July 2007, Week 1
June 2007, Week 5
June 2007, Week 4
June 2007, Week 3
June 2007, Week 2
June 2007, Week 1
May 2007, Week 5
May 2007, Week 4
May 2007, Week 3
May 2007, Week 2
May 2007, Week 1
April 2007, Week 5
April 2007, Week 4
April 2007, Week 3
April 2007, Week 2
April 2007, Week 1
March 2007, Week 5
March 2007, Week 4
March 2007, Week 3
March 2007, Week 2
March 2007, Week 1
February 2007, Week 4
February 2007, Week 3
February 2007, Week 2
February 2007, Week 1
January 2007, Week 5
January 2007, Week 4
January 2007, Week 3
January 2007, Week 2
January 2007, Week 1
December 2006, Week 5
December 2006, Week 4
December 2006, Week 3
December 2006, Week 2
December 2006, Week 1
November 2006, Week 5
November 2006, Week 4
November 2006, Week 3
November 2006, Week 2
November 2006, Week 1
October 2006, Week 5
October 2006, Week 4
October 2006, Week 3
October 2006, Week 2
October 2006, Week 1
September 2006, Week 5
September 2006, Week 4
September 2006, Week 3
September 2006, Week 2
September 2006, Week 1
August 2006, Week 5
August 2006, Week 4
August 2006, Week 3
August 2006, Week 2
August 2006, Week 1
July 2006, Week 5
July 2006, Week 4
July 2006, Week 3
July 2006, Week 2
July 2006, Week 1
June 2006, Week 5
June 2006, Week 4
June 2006, Week 3
June 2006, Week 2
June 2006, Week 1
May 2006, Week 5
May 2006, Week 4
May 2006, Week 3
May 2006, Week 2
May 2006, Week 1
April 2006, Week 5
April 2006, Week 4
April 2006, Week 3
April 2006, Week 2
April 2006, Week 1
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005, Week 1
June 2005
May 2005, Week 5
May 2005, Week 4
May 2005, Week 3
May 2005, Week 2
May 2005, Week 1
April 2005, Week 5
April 2005, Week 4
April 2005, Week 3
April 2005, Week 2
April 2005, Week 1
March 2005, Week 5
March 2005, Week 4
March 2005, Week 3
March 2005, Week 2
March 2005, Week 1
February 2005, Week 4
February 2005, Week 3
February 2005, Week 2
February 2005, Week 1
January 2005, Week 5
January 2005, Week 4
January 2005, Week 3
January 2005, Week 2
January 2005, Week 1
December 2004, Week 4
December 2004, Week 3
December 2004, Week 2
December 2004, Week 1
November 2004, Week 5
November 2004, Week 4
November 2004, Week 3
November 2004, Week 2
November 2004, Week 1
October 2004, Week 5
October 2004, Week 4
October 2004, Week 3
October 2004, Week 2
October 2004, Week 1
September 2004, Week 5
September 2004, Week 4
September 2004, Week 3
September 2004, Week 2
September 2004, Week 1
August 2004, Week 5
August 2004, Week 4
August 2004, Week 3
August 2004, Week 2
August 2004, Week 1
July 2004, Week 5
July 2004, Week 4
July 2004, Week 3
July 2004, Week 2
July 2004, Week 1
June 2004, Week 5
June 2004, Week 4
June 2004, Week 3
June 2004, Week 2
June 2004, Week 1
May 2004, Week 5
May 2004, Week 4
May 2004, Week 3
May 2004, Week 2
May 2004, Week 1
April 2004, Week 5
April 2004, Week 4
April 2004, Week 3
April 2004, Week 2
April 2004, Week 1
March 2004, Week 5
March 2004, Week 4
March 2004, Week 3
March 2004, Week 2
March 2004, Week 1
February 2004, Week 5
February 2004, Week 4
February 2004, Week 3
February 2004, Week 2
February 2004, Week 1
January 2004, Week 5
January 2004, Week 4
January 2004, Week 3
January 2004, Week 2
January 2004, Week 1
December 2003, Week 5
December 2003, Week 4
December 2003, Week 3
December 2003, Week 2
December 2003, Week 1
November 2003, Week 5
November 2003, Week 4
November 2003, Week 3
November 2003, Week 2
November 2003, Week 1
October 2003, Week 5
October 2003, Week 4
October 2003, Week 3
October 2003, Week 2
October 2003, Week 1
September 2003, Week 5
September 2003, Week 4
September 2003, Week 3
September 2003, Week 2
September 2003, Week 1
August 2003, Week 5
August 2003, Week 4
August 2003, Week 3
August 2003, Week 2
August 2003, Week 1
July 2003, Week 5
July 2003, Week 4
July 2003, Week 3
July 2003, Week 2
July 2003, Week 1
June 2003, Week 5
June 2003, Week 4
June 2003, Week 3
June 2003, Week 2
June 2003, Week 1
May 2003, Week 5
May 2003, Week 4
May 2003, Week 3
May 2003, Week 2
May 2003, Week 1
April 2003, Week 5
April 2003, Week 4
April 2003, Week 3
April 2003, Week 2
April 2003, Week 1
March 2003, Week 5
March 2003, Week 4
March 2003, Week 3
March 2003, Week 2
March 2003, Week 1
February 2003, Week 4
February 2003, Week 3
February 2003, Week 2
February 2003, Week 1
January 2003, Week 5
January 2003, Week 4
January 2003, Week 3
January 2003, Week 2
January 2003, Week 1
December 2002, Week 5
December 2002, Week 4
December 2002, Week 3
December 2002, Week 2
December 2002, Week 1
November 2002, Week 5
November 2002, Week 4
November 2002, Week 3
November 2002, Week 2
November 2002, Week 1
October 2002, Week 5
October 2002, Week 4
October 2002, Week 3
October 2002, Week 2
October 2002, Week 1
September 2002, Week 5
September 2002, Week 4
September 2002, Week 3
September 2002, Week 2
September 2002, Week 1
August 2002, Week 5
August 2002, Week 4
August 2002, Week 3
August 2002, Week 2
August 2002, Week 1
July 2002, Week 5
July 2002, Week 4
July 2002, Week 3
July 2002, Week 2
July 2002, Week 1
June 2002, Week 5
June 2002, Week 4
June 2002, Week 3
June 2002, Week 2
June 2002, Week 1
May 2002, Week 5
May 2002, Week 4
May 2002, Week 3
May 2002, Week 2
May 2002, Week 1
April 2002, Week 5
April 2002, Week 4
April 2002, Week 3
April 2002, Week 2
April 2002, Week 1
March 2002, Week 5
March 2002, Week 4
March 2002, Week 3
March 2002, Week 2
March 2002, Week 1
February 2002, Week 4
February 2002, Week 3
February 2002, Week 2
February 2002, Week 1
January 2002, Week 5
January 2002, Week 4
January 2002, Week 3
January 2002, Week 2
January 2002, Week 1
December 2001, Week 5
December 2001, Week 4
December 2001, Week 3
December 2001, Week 2
December 2001, Week 1
November 2001, Week 5
November 2001, Week 4
November 2001, Week 3
November 2001, Week 2
November 2001, Week 1
October 2001, Week 5
October 2001, Week 4
October 2001, Week 3
October 2001, Week 2
October 2001, Week 1
September 2001, Week 5
September 2001, Week 4
September 2001, Week 3
September 2001, Week 2
September 2001, Week 1
August 2001, Week 5
August 2001, Week 4
August 2001, Week 3
August 2001, Week 2
August 2001, Week 1
July 2001, Week 5
July 2001, Week 4
July 2001, Week 3
July 2001, Week 2
July 2001, Week 1
June 2001, Week 5
June 2001, Week 4
June 2001, Week 3
June 2001, Week 2
June 2001, Week 1
May 2001, Week 5
May 2001, Week 4
May 2001, Week 3
May 2001, Week 2
May 2001, Week 1
April 2001, Week 5
April 2001, Week 4
April 2001, Week 3
April 2001, Week 2
April 2001, Week 1
March 2001, Week 5
March 2001, Week 4
March 2001, Week 3
March 2001, Week 2
March 2001, Week 1
February 2001, Week 4
February 2001, Week 3
February 2001, Week 2
February 2001, Week 1
January 2001, Week 5
January 2001, Week 4
January 2001, Week 3
January 2001, Week 2
January 2001, Week 1
December 2000, Week 5
December 2000, Week 4
December 2000, Week 3
December 2000, Week 2
December 2000, Week 1
November 2000, Week 5
November 2000, Week 4
November 2000, Week 3
November 2000, Week 2
November 2000, Week 1
October 2000, Week 5
October 2000, Week 4
October 2000, Week 3
October 2000, Week 2
October 2000, Week 1
September 2000, Week 5
September 2000, Week 4
September 2000, Week 3
September 2000, Week 2
September 2000, Week 1
August 2000, Week 5
August 2000, Week 4
August 2000, Week 3
August 2000, Week 2
August 2000, Week 1
July 2000, Week 5
July 2000, Week 4
July 2000, Week 3
July 2000, Week 2
July 2000, Week 1
June 2000, Week 5
June 2000, Week 4
June 2000, Week 3
June 2000, Week 2
June 2000, Week 1
May 2000, Week 5
May 2000, Week 4
May 2000, Week 3
May 2000, Week 2
May 2000, Week 1
April 2000, Week 5
April 2000, Week 4
April 2000, Week 3
April 2000, Week 2
April 2000, Week 1
March 2000, Week 5
March 2000, Week 4
March 2000, Week 3
March 2000, Week 2
March 2000, Week 1
February 2000, Week 5
February 2000, Week 4
February 2000, Week 3
February 2000, Week 2
February 2000, Week 1
January 2000, Week 5
January 2000, Week 4
January 2000, Week 3
January 2000, Week 2
January 2000, Week 1
December 1999, Week 4
December 1999, Week 3
December 1999, Week 2
December 1999, Week 1
November 1999, Week 5
November 1999, Week 4
November 1999, Week 3
November 1999, Week 2
November 1999, Week 1
October 1999, Week 5
October 1999, Week 4
October 1999, Week 3
October 1999, Week 2
October 1999, Week 1
September 1999, Week 5
September 1999, Week 4
September 1999, Week 3
September 1999, Week 2
September 1999, Week 1
August 1999, Week 5
August 1999, Week 4
August 1999, Week 3
August 1999, Week 2
August 1999, Week 1
July 1999, Week 5
July 1999, Week 4
July 1999, Week 3
July 1999, Week 2
July 1999, Week 1
June 1999, Week 5
June 1999, Week 4
June 1999, Week 3
June 1999, Week 2
June 1999, Week 1
May 1999, Week 5
May 1999, Week 4
May 1999, Week 3
May 1999, Week 2
May 1999, Week 1
April 1999, Week 5
April 1999, Week 4
April 1999, Week 3
April 1999, Week 2
April 1999, Week 1
March 1999, Week 5
March 1999, Week 4
March 1999, Week 3
March 1999, Week 2
March 1999, Week 1
February 1999, Week 4
February 1999, Week 3
February 1999, Week 2
February 1999, Week 1
January 1999, Week 5
January 1999, Week 4
January 1999, Week 3
January 1999, Week 2
January 1999, Week 1
December 1998, Week 4
December 1998, Week 3
December 1998, Week 2
December 1998, Week 1
November 1998, Week 5
November 1998, Week 4
November 1998, Week 3
November 1998, Week 2
November 1998, Week 1
October 1998, Week 5
October 1998, Week 4
October 1998, Week 3
October 1998, Week 2
October 1998, Week 1
September 1998, Week 5
September 1998, Week 4
September 1998, Week 3
September 1998, Week 2
September 1998, Week 1
August 1998, Week 5
August 1998, Week 4
August 1998, Week 3
August 1998, Week 2
August 1998, Week 1
July 1998, Week 5
July 1998, Week 4
July 1998, Week 3
July 1998, Week 2
July 1998, Week 1
June 1998, Week 5
June 1998, Week 4
June 1998, Week 3
June 1998, Week 2
June 1998, Week 1
May 1998, Week 5
May 1998, Week 4
May 1998, Week 3
May 1998, Week 2
May 1998, Week 1
April 1998, Week 5
April 1998, Week 4
April 1998, Week 3
April 1998, Week 2
April 1998, Week 1
March 1998, Week 5
March 1998, Week 4
March 1998, Week 3
March 1998, Week 2
March 1998, Week 1
February 1998, Week 4
February 1998, Week 3
February 1998, Week 2
February 1998, Week 1
January 1998, Week 5
January 1998, Week 4
January 1998, Week 3
January 1998, Week 2
January 1998, Week 1
December 1997, Week 5
December 1997, Week 4
December 1997, Week 3
December 1997, Week 2
December 1997, Week 1
November 1997, Week 5
November 1997, Week 4
November 1997, Week 3
November 1997, Week 2
November 1997, Week 1
October 1997, Week 5
October 1997, Week 4
October 1997, Week 3
October 1997, Week 2
October 1997, Week 1
September 1997, Week 5
September 1997, Week 4
September 1997, Week 3
September 1997, Week 2
September 1997, Week 1
August 1997, Week 5
August 1997, Week 4
August 1997, Week 3
August 1997, Week 2
August 1997, Week 1
July 1997, Week 5
July 1997, Week 4
July 1997, Week 3
July 1997, Week 2
July 1997, Week 1
June 1997, Week 5
June 1997, Week 4
June 1997, Week 3
June 1997, Week 2
June 1997, Week 1
May 1997, Week 5
May 1997, Week 4
May 1997, Week 3
May 1997, Week 2
May 1997, Week 1
April 1997, Week 5
April 1997, Week 4
April 1997, Week 3
April 1997, Week 2
April 1997, Week 1
March 1997, Week 5
March 1997, Week 4
March 1997, Week 3
March 1997, Week 2
March 1997, Week 1
February 1997, Week 4
February 1997, Week 3
February 1997, Week 2
February 1997, Week 1
January 1997, Week 5
January 1997, Week 4
January 1997, Week 3
January 1997, Week 2
January 1997, Week 1
December 1996, Week 5
December 1996, Week 4
December 1996, Week 3
December 1996, Week 2
December 1996, Week 1
November 1996, Week 5
November 1996, Week 4
November 1996, Week 3
November 1996, Week 2
November 1996, Week 1
October 1996, Week 5
October 1996, Week 4
October 1996, Week 3
October 1996, Week 2
October 1996, Week 1
September 1996, Week 5
September 1996, Week 4
September 1996, Week 3
September 1996, Week 2
September 1996, Week 1
August 1996, Week 5
August 1996, Week 4
August 1996, Week 3
August 1996, Week 2
August 1996, Week 1
July 1996, Week 5
July 1996, Week 4
July 1996, Week 3
July 1996, Week 2
July 1996, Week 1
June 1996, Week 4
June 1996, Week 3
June 1996, Week 2
June 1996, Week 1
May 1996, Week 4
May 1996, Week 3
May 1996, Week 2
May 1996, Week 1
April 1996, Week 4
April 1996, Week 3
April 1996, Week 2
April 1996, Week 1
March 1996, Week 4
March 1996, Week 3
March 1996, Week 2
March 1996, Week 1
February 1996, Week 4
February 1996, Week 3
February 1996, Week 2
February 1996, Week 1
January 1996, Week 4
January 1996, Week 3
January 1996, Week 2
January 1996, Week 1
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994
August 1994
July 1994
June 1994
May 1994
April 1994
March 1994
February 1994
January 1994
December 1993
November 1993
October 1993
September 1993
August 1993
July 1993
June 1993
May 1993
April 1993
March 1993
February 1993
January 1993
December 1992
November 1992
October 1992
September 1992
August 1992
July 1992
June 1992
May 1992
April 1992
March 1992
February 1992
January 1992
December 1991
November 1991
October 1991
September 1991
August 1991
July 1991
June 1991
May 1991
April 1991
March 1991
February 1991
January 1991
December 1990
November 1990
October 1990
September 1990
August 1990
July 1990
June 1990
May 1990
April 1990
March 1990
February 1990
January 1990
December 1989
November 1989
October 1989
September 1989
August 1989
July 1989

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager