ISEN-ASTC-L Archives

Informal Science Education Network

ISEN-ASTC-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jeff Courtman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informal Science Education Network <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 May 2008 12:17:25 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (135 lines)
ISEN-ASTC-L is a service of the Association of Science-Technology Centers
Incorporated, a worldwide network of science museums and related institutions.
*****************************************************************************

Au contraire, engaging in  'science' is an everyday thing.....a  
paraphrase of, in many ways,  Paulos' book 'Innumeracy,' wherein the  
argument is that it is a layperson's misconceptions about math are  
one of the things that keep them in a sort of self-imposed state of,  
'I don't do Math' because I don't understand Math.

I would also suggest reading about science can be every bit as  
appealing, intriguing, and fun as doing:  Reading about the history  
of the Manhattan project, reading about the elucidation of the double  
helix were all those things.  Is it the same?  No.  Does it provide  
me with a better understanding?  Sometimes.  Having the  
responsibility to help people reach some holy grail is way to much  
responsibility for me!

I think Robert put it well when he spoke about pedagogy being of over  
importance in the sense that pedagogy, in the sense he used it, comes  
from creating a framework that encompasses experience, not the other  
way around.

I use pedagogy to think about what I'm doing,  not to drive what I'm  
doing.

Again, an open-ended experience can be very intimidating to people  
who like rules and structure.  (Not me - I like to play!  But I have  
seen it over and over).

And hey, I'm not suggesting you are wrong, nor that I'm right - its  
kind of like the argument about whether or not Bernoulli does a  
better job of describing flight than a more simple action/reaction  
model - we forget they are both right, just different ways of  
describing a phenomena.  I'm suggesting that declarative statements  
such as open-ended exhibits are intrinsically more appealing to more  
people, and therefore, more effective, make me nervous.


	


On May 19, 2008, at 11:39 AM, Ed Sobey wrote:

> *This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate 
> (tm) Pro*
> ISEN-ASTC-L is a service of the Association of Science-Technology  
> Centers
> Incorporated, a worldwide network of science museums and related  
> institutions.
> ********************************************************************** 
> *******
>
> Jeff-
>
> As Susan pointed out, I don't claim that an open-ended exhibit  
> appeals to
> all intelligences - just a lot more than a non-open ended one.
>
> The context is getting people to do science. Reading about science  
> is not
> the same - it doesn't have the appeal, the intrigue, or the fun.  
> Getting
> people to do science should be the holy grail. They can read about  
> science
> at home on their computers (without paying for parking, admissions,  
> getting
> dressed). What they can't do at home is engage in science. On the  
> exhibit
> floor that requires a gentle nudge, a fun opportunity, and stuff to  
> mess
> around with.
>
> I agree that museums don't do a good job of launching visitors into
> open-ended experiences. The most effective method (not the only  
> method) is
> human contact. One person on the floor can instigate creative  
> research by
> many dozens of visitors if done well. Not an explainer - that lead
> questioner.
>
> The pecunious reader will balk at the thought of putting someone on  
> the
> floor, but it can be done economically with some change in management
> strategy. And, the results justify the investment.
>
> Howard Gardner tells us that the best way for people to learn is to  
> engage
> in mentally challenging projects where they can use their favored
> intelligences. We know the best methods - why aren't museums  
> following them?
>
> Ed
>
> Ed Sobey, Ph.D.
> Global Evangelist for Creative Learning
> Northwest Invention Center
> (425) 861-8685
> www.invention-center.com
> www.kidsinvent.com
> www.asiainvents.com
>
>
>  PS - As my title evokes, I am trying to sway your opinion.
>
> ********************************************************************** 
> *
> For information about the Association of Science-Technology Centers  
> and the Informal Science Education Network please visit www.astc.org.
>
> Check out the latest case studies and reviews on ExhibitFiles at  
> www.exhibitfiles.org.
>
> The ISEN-ASTC-L email list is powered by LISTSERVR software from L- 
> Soft. To learn more, visit
> http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html.
>
> To remove your e-mail address from the ISEN-ASTC-L list, send the
> message  SIGNOFF ISEN-ASTC-L in the BODY of a message to
> [log in to unmask]
>


***********************************************************************
For information about the Association of Science-Technology Centers and the Informal Science Education Network please visit www.astc.org.

Check out the latest case studies and reviews on ExhibitFiles at www.exhibitfiles.org.

The ISEN-ASTC-L email list is powered by LISTSERVR software from L-Soft. To learn more, visit
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html.

To remove your e-mail address from the ISEN-ASTC-L list, send the
message  SIGNOFF ISEN-ASTC-L in the BODY of a message to
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2